Marquis Mill Park
1475 SE 100th Avenue, Portland, OR 97216 · Multnomah County · 77 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1990
Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 3, 2025 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Feb 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 24, 2026 · F-0760
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 15, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (17)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Apr 24, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Apr 24, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint |
| Apr 24, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). |
| Apr 24, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Feb 3, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Feb 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Feb 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Feb 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. |
| Feb 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. |
| Feb 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint |
| Feb 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Aug 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 9).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2026 | 9 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
2 fines totaling $35,010.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2026 | Fine | $17,665 |
| Feb 3, 2025 | Fine | $17,345 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.96 | 5.42 | 3.95 | bottom 24% in Oregon; top 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.43 | 0.78 | 0.69 | top 6% in Oregon; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.32 | 4.85 | 3.50 | bottom 21% in Oregon; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.83 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 10% in Oregon; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.9 | 47.4 | 45.8 | top 38% in Oregon; top 44% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.1 | 51.6 | 42.9 | top 8% in Oregon; top 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.19, RN 1.50, weekend 4.52. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/1994 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/1994 |
| Bucher, Amy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2007 |
| Bucher, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2007 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/1994 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/1994 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2001 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2001 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2001 |
| Hagen, Jennifer | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/24/2007 |
| Hagen, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/24/2007 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/1994 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gateway Care and Retirement | 0.7 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Glisan Post Acute | 0.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Portland Health and Rehabilitation | 1.1 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Menlo Park Post Acute | 1.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia | 1.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rose City Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avalon Care Center - Portland | 1.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Gracelen Care Center | 1.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Mt. Tabor Health & Rehabilitation | 2.0 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cascade Terrace Post Acute | 2.3 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Belmont Care and Rehabilitation | 2.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Evergreen Post Acute | 2.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385214.