14645 SW Farmington Road, Beaverton, OR 97007 (opens Google Maps) · Washington County · (503) 643-8626· 165 certified beds · avg 130 residents/day · certified since Feb 22, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 18, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Mar 20, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 3, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Dec 18, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 17, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 2, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint F-0760
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint · F-0582 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759 |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Aug 17, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Aug 17, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jan 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jan 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 14, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 15 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $107,136.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2023 | Fine | $107,136 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.86 | 5.42 | 3.95 | top 21% in Oregon; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.08 | 0.78 | 0.69 | top 13% in Oregon; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.30 | 4.85 | 3.50 | top 20% in Oregon; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 21% in Oregon; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.9 | 47.4 | 45.8 | top 50% in Oregon; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 34.5 | 51.6 | 42.9 | top 22% in Oregon; top 38% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.52, RN 1.02, weekend 5.00.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Maryville. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Mary of Oregon Ministries Oregon | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2006 |
| Altenhofen, Adele | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2006 |
| Altenhofen, Adele | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2006 |
| Altenhofen, Adele | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2006 |
| Baertlein, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Barger, Eric | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
| Brecht, Jeff | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Calcagno, Kathy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Cope, Bret | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/25/2021 |
| Dolan, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Duncan, Francine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2020 |
| Fox, Kelley | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Gilbert, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Parry, Kathleen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/06/2004 |
| Parry, Kathleen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/06/2004 |
| Parry, Kathleen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/22/2025 |
| Rask, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Rodlun, Laureli | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2008 |
| St Mary of Oregon Ministries Oregon | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2006 |
| St Mary of Oregon Ministries Oregon | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2026 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia | 1.6 mi | Beaverton, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Robison Jewish Health Center | 4.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marquis Autumn Hills Memory Care | 4.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Marquis Vermont Hills | 4.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| West Hills Health & Rehabilitation | 4.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tigard Rehabilitation and Care | 5.1 mi | Tigard, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Avamere Crestview of Portland | 5.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of King City | 6.1 mi | Tigard, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hillsboro Health and Rehabilitation | 7.0 mi | Hillsboro, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Pearl at Kruse Way | 7.0 mi | Lake Oswego, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro | 7.6 mi | Hillsboro, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mirabella Portland | 7.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Washington, OR — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385166.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details