Maryville
14645 SW Farmington Road, Beaverton, OR 97007 · Washington County · 165 certified beds · avg 130 residents/day · certified since Feb 22, 1985
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 18, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 20, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jan 3, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 18, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 17, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Oct 2, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (23)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint |
| Apr 11, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Jan 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 20, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint |
| Dec 18, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| Aug 17, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Aug 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Aug 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Jan 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jan 14, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 15 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $107,136.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2023 | Fine | $107,136 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.86 | 5.42 | 3.95 | top 21% in Oregon; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.08 | 0.78 | 0.69 | top 13% in Oregon; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.30 | 4.85 | 3.50 | top 20% in Oregon; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.62 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 21% in Oregon; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.9 | 47.4 | 45.8 | top 50% in Oregon; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 34.5 | 51.6 | 42.9 | top 22% in Oregon; top 38% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.52, RN 1.02, weekend 5.00. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Mary of Oregon Ministries Oregon | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2006 |
| Altenhofen, Adele | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2006 |
| Altenhofen, Adele | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2006 |
| Altenhofen, Adele | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2006 |
| Baertlein, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Barger, Eric | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
| Brecht, Jeff | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Calcagno, Kathy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2019 |
| Cope, Bret | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/25/2021 |
| Dolan, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Duncan, Francine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/25/2020 |
| Fox, Kelley | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Gilbert, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| Parry, Kathleen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/06/2004 |
| Parry, Kathleen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/06/2004 |
| Parry, Kathleen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/22/2025 |
| Rask, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Rodlun, Laureli | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2008 |
| St Mary of Oregon Ministries Oregon | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2006 |
| St Mary of Oregon Ministries Oregon | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2026 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia | 1.6 mi | Beaverton, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Robison Jewish Health Center | 4.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marquis Autumn Hills Memory Care | 4.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Marquis Vermont Hills | 4.4 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| West Hills Health & Rehabilitation | 4.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tigard Rehabilitation and Care | 5.1 mi | Tigard, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Avamere Crestview of Portland | 5.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of King City | 6.1 mi | Tigard, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hillsboro Health and Rehabilitation | 7.0 mi | Hillsboro, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Pearl at Kruse Way | 7.0 mi | Lake Oswego, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro | 7.6 mi | Hillsboro, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mirabella Portland | 7.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385166.