How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1577 S Ivy, Canby, OR 97013 (opens Google Maps) · Clackamas County · (503) 266-5541· 50 certified beds · avg 42 residents/day · certified since Sep 11, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. F-0730
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. F-0637
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| May 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Apr 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.41 | 5.42 | 3.95 | top 44% in Oregon; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.69 | top 41% in Oregon; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.97 | 4.85 | 3.50 | top 34% in Oregon; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 50% in Oregon; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.4 | 47.4 | 45.8 | bottom 41% in Oregon; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 51.6 | 42.9 | top 40% in Oregon; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.85, RN 0.66, weekend 4.45.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Marquis Hope Village. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/1998 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 03/01/1998 |
| Bucher, Amy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2007 |
| Bucher, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2007 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/1998 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/1998 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2001 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2001 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/16/2001 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/1998 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Companies — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab | 5.1 mi | Wilsonville, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Rose Linn Care Center | 7.3 mi | West Linn, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Marquis Oregon City Post Acute Rehab | 7.6 mi | Oregon City, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Rivercrest Post Acute | 7.6 mi | Oregon City, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Woodside Post Acute | 8.4 mi | Molalla, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City | 8.8 mi | Oregon City, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab | 9.6 mi | Tualatin, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Clackamas | 10.5 mi | Gladstone, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| French Prairie Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 11.6 mi | Woodburn, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of King City | 11.7 mi | Tigard, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Pearl at Kruse Way | 11.8 mi | Lake Oswego, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Fernwood Supportive Living at Madrona Grove | 12.3 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Clackamas, OR — 13 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385260.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details