Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab
725 SE 202nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97233 · Multnomah County · 80 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Jul 26, 1988
Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 3, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jun 20, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (19)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Aug 22, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Aug 22, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. |
| May 3, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| May 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| May 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| May 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| May 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| May 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| May 3, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Mar 1, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 5).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $10,033.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.31 | 5.42 | 3.95 | bottom 48% in Oregon; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.88 | 0.78 | 0.69 | top 25% in Oregon; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.79 | 4.85 | 3.50 | bottom 50% in Oregon; top 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 38% in Oregon; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 32.0 | 47.4 | 45.8 | top 11% in Oregon; top 18% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 51.6 | 42.9 | top 7% in Oregon; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.03, RN 0.83, weekend 4.54. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/22/2012 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/01/2015 |
| English, Meagan | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| English, Meagan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Levee, Kathleen | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Levee, Kathleen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Stone, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How often are beds and bed rails inspected, and who does those checks?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gresham Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation | 1.9 mi | Gresham, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Village Health Care | 1.9 mi | Gresham, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Village Manor of Cascadia | 2.4 mi | Wood Village, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fairlawn Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia | 3.0 mi | Gresham, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Avalon Care Center - Portland | 3.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Portland Health and Rehabilitation | 3.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Menlo Park Post Acute | 3.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cedar Crossings | 4.0 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rose City Nursing and Rehabilitation | 4.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cascade Terrace Post Acute | 4.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 4.8 mi | Gresham, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Marquis Mill Park | 4.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385183.