New JerseyEatontown

Jersey Shore Center

3 Industrial Way East, Eatontown, NJ 07724 · Monmouth County · 158 certified beds · avg 126 residents/day · certified since Apr 3, 1997

Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 18, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Feb 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 25, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 25, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Mar 25, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Mar 25, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff.
Mar 25, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150E
202390E
2025100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.393.883.95bottom 31% in New Jersey; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.750.670.69top 27% in New Jersey; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.163.533.50bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.500.48top 21% in New Jersey; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.439.745.8bottom 37% in New Jersey; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.537.742.9top 23% in New Jersey; top 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.33, RN 0.74, weekend 3.10. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2021
Gen Operations I LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Gen Operations II LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Genesis Healthcare INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Genesis Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Genesis Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Genesis NJ Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2011
Genesis Operations LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
GHC Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Sun Healthcare Group INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Whitman, ArnoldIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Berg, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2012
Bridgeford, LauraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Chapla, PravinchandraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Chapla, PravinchandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2025
Genesis Operations LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Mendelson, AviIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Ruchaevsky, DimitryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Ruchaevsky, DimitryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Shore Pointe Care Center1.5 miEatontown, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Monmouth, LLC2.9 miLong Branch, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Imperial Care Center4.1 miNeptune, NJ★★★★☆4/5
King Manor Care and Rehabilitation Center4.2 miNeptune, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Continuing Care at Seabrook4.5 miTinton Falls, NJ★★★★★5/5
Redbank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing4.7 miRed Bank, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Aster Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.8 miTinton Falls, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Complete Care at Shrewsbury LLC4.9 miShrewsbury, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Ocean Grove LLC4.9 miOcean Grove, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Jersey Shore Post Acute Rehabilitation and Nursing4.9 miNeptune, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.9 miNeptune City, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Atrium at Navesink Harbor, the5.3 miRed Bank, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Eatontown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315364.