New JerseyMillville

Millville Center

54 Sharp Street, Millville, NJ 08332 · Cumberland County · 167 certified beds · avg 134 residents/day · certified since Apr 27, 1987

Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$144,441
Fines, last 3 years
3.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 5, 2026 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 30, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 5, 2026 · F-0806 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.

Why it matters: Ignoring allergies can be dangerous, and ignoring preferences leads residents to eat less and lose weight.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 30, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 2, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 2, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 5, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jun 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 2, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Feb 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 6, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202010D
202371G ▲
202460D
202540E
202622J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $144,441.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 5, 2026Fine$144,441

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.173.883.95bottom 12% in New Jersey; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.530.670.69bottom 45% in New Jersey; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.823.533.50bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.500.48bottom 35% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.239.745.8top 28% in New Jersey; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.537.742.9top 23% in New Jersey; top 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 0.55, weekend 2.93. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fc-Gen Operations Investment LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Gen Operations I LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Gen Operations II LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Genesis Healthcare INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Genesis Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Genesis Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Genesis NJ Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2011
Genesis Operations LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
GHC Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/01/2011
Sun Healthcare Group INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/2015
Whitman, ArnoldIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/31/2011
Berg, MichaelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2012
Bridgeford, LauraIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Conti, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Conti, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2025
Genesis Administrative Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/17/2025
Genesis Operations LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/17/2025
Mendelson, AviIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Sullivan, LawrenceIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Sullivan, LawrenceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/20/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Vineland4.5 miVineland, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Bishop McCarthy Center for Rehab & Healthcare4.8 miVineland, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
New Jersey Veterans Memorial Vineland5.9 miVineland, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Big Oak Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center6.6 miPittsgrove, NJ★★☆☆☆3/5
South Jersey Extended Care9.4 miBridgeton, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Preferred Care at Cumberland11.9 miBridgeton, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Cedar Grove Respiratory and Nursing Center18.0 miWilliamstown, NJ★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Millville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315243.