How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
2050 Sixth Ave, Neptune City, NJ 07753 (opens Google Maps) · Monmouth County · (732) 774-8300· 110 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1969 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 10, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent May 7, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.73
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 7, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 7, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 4, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint F-0921
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Oct 24, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint · F-0921 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Jan 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint · F-0635 |
| Dec 28, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jun 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.73
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.87
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.09
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.73 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 45% in New Jersey; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.87 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 20% in New Jersey; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.09 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 31% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 32% in New Jersey; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 33% in New Jersey; top 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 49% in New Jersey; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.51, RN 0.82, weekend 2.90.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.51 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr 2013 Investment Tr Ua 03252013 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 23% | 12/31/2021 |
| Coral Harbor Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Kohn Fam Tr GST Exempt Uad 3-25-13 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2021 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2021 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Private Bancorp INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Quinto Guardian LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2019 |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/13/2017 |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2025 |
| Roper, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Roper, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Rosenblum, Eliyahu | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Rosenblum, Eliyahu | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2021 |
| SK 2013 Investment Tr Ua 03252013 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2021 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Crest Pointe Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Pt Pleasant, NJ · overall 1/5
- Florham Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Florham Park, NJ · overall 5/5
- Laurel Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Mount Laurel, NJ · overall 2/5
- Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows at Lawrence — Lawrenceville, NJ · overall 2/5
- Lawrence Rehabilitation Hospital — Lawrenceville, NJ · overall 2/5
- Merwick Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC — Plainsboro, NJ · overall 3/5
- Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Lumberton, NJ · overall 1/5abuse
- Oakland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Oakland, NJ · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 34% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 55 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jersey Shore Post Acute Rehabilitation and Nursing | 0.4 mi | Neptune, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| King Manor Care and Rehabilitation Center | 0.8 mi | Neptune, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Ocean Grove LLC | 1.3 mi | Ocean Grove, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Imperial Care Center | 2.0 mi | Neptune, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Tower Lodge Care Center | 2.3 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Continuing Care at Seabrook | 2.7 mi | Tinton Falls, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Careone at Wall | 2.8 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Aster Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.3 mi | Tinton Falls, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Wall LLC | 3.3 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Jersey Shore Center | 4.9 mi | Eatontown, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sunnyside Manor | 5.1 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Shore Pointe Care Center | 6.0 mi | Eatontown, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Monmouth, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- De la Salle Hall — Lincroft, NJ · overall 5/5
- Excel Care at Manalapan — Manalapan, NJ · overall 2/5
- Jewish Home for Rehabilitation and Nursing, the — Freehold, NJ · overall 5/5
- Laurel Bay Health & Rehabilitation Center — Keansburg, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315105.