New JerseyEatontown

Shore Pointe Care Center

139 Grant Ave, Eatontown, NJ 07724 · Monmouth County · 178 certified beds · avg 145 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1981

Part of chain: THE ROSENBERG FAMILY (16 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$135,795
Fines, last 3 years
4.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 17, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 9, 2025 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 27, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 17, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 9, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 9, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 9, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility was not properly licensed, or did not operate in compliance with federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and accepted professional standards.
Sep 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Sep 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
May 26, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 26, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 26, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202280F
202380E
2025102J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $135,795.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 17, 2025Fine$108,154
Jan 9, 2025Fine$27,641

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.013.883.95top 29% in New Jersey; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.000.670.69top 12% in New Jersey; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.453.533.50top 42% in New Jersey; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.690.500.48top 16% in New Jersey; top 16% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.039.745.8top 46% in New Jersey; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)30.837.742.9top 36% in New Jersey; top 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.11, RN 0.77, weekend 2.67. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gateway Care Center, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest10/01/2002
Rosenberg, JonathanIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest09/01/2016
Abboud, WalidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Abboud, WalidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Capuano, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/07/2022
Capuano, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Gateway Care Center, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Gateway Eatontown Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2002
Gateway Eatontown Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2002
Gateway Eatontown Associates LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2002
Rosenberg, JonathanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2002
Stern, SamuelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Stern, SamuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Jersey Shore Center1.5 miEatontown, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Redbank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing3.3 miRed Bank, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Shrewsbury LLC3.8 miShrewsbury, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Monmouth, LLC3.9 miLong Branch, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Atrium at Navesink Harbor, the4.1 miRed Bank, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Imperial Care Center4.7 miNeptune, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Continuing Care at Seabrook4.9 miTinton Falls, NJ★★★★★5/5
De la Salle Hall4.9 miLincroft, NJ★★★★★4/5
Aster Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.1 miTinton Falls, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
King Manor Care and Rehabilitation Center5.3 miNeptune, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Jersey Shore Post Acute Rehabilitation and Nursing5.9 miNeptune, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center6.0 miNeptune City, NJ★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Eatontown →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315177.