How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
919 Green Grove Road, Neptune, NJ 07753 (opens Google Maps) · Monmouth County · (732) 922-3400· 121 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. F-0814
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. F-0609
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jan 13, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 27, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 10).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 10 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.86 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 36% in New Jersey; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 49% in New Jersey; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.55 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 36% in New Jersey; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 46% in New Jersey; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 17.9 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 6% in New Jersey; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 25% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.61, RN 0.54, weekend 3.32.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.61 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Imperial Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schon, Mordechai | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/26/2009 |
| Schon, Mordechai | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/26/2009 |
| Steinfeld, Yehuda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Steinfeld, Yehuda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
All 4 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuing Care at Seabrook | 0.8 mi | Tinton Falls, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aster Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 1.5 mi | Tinton Falls, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Jersey Shore Post Acute Rehabilitation and Nursing | 1.7 mi | Neptune, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| King Manor Care and Rehabilitation Center | 1.7 mi | Neptune, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 2.0 mi | Neptune City, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tower Lodge Care Center | 2.4 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Ocean Grove LLC | 3.1 mi | Ocean Grove, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at Wall | 3.6 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Wall LLC | 4.0 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Jersey Shore Center | 4.1 mi | Eatontown, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Shore Pointe Care Center | 4.7 mi | Eatontown, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sunnyside Manor | 5.8 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Monmouth, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315199.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details