New JerseyRed Bank

Redbank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing

100 Chapin Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701 · Monmouth County · 180 certified beds · avg 166 residents/day · certified since Sep 22, 1989

Part of chain: INFINITE CARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.82
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 11, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 11, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Jan 11, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jan 11, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 11, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 11, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jan 11, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 28, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 28, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule.
Oct 28, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 14).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202030E
2023120F
2025140E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.823.883.95bottom 1% in New Jersey; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.310.670.69bottom 8% in New Jersey; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.603.533.50bottom 4% in New Jersey; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.500.48bottom 25% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.339.745.8bottom 33% in New Jersey; top 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.837.742.9top 50% in New Jersey; top 41% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.02, RN 0.33, weekend 2.78. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CH RB Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest23%07/17/2023
CW RB Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest23%07/17/2023
CZH Investments LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
Herzka, ChaimIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
Koi Equities LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
RB SNF Operations Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/17/2023
Seam Ny 2020 TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest48%07/17/2023
SK RB Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
Ahmad, NasirIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Ahmad, NasirIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
American Plan Administrators LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
Berkowitz, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2017
Berkowitz, MichaelIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
Capital Finance LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
CH RB Holdings LLCOrganizationLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
Herzka, ChaimIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2016
Herzka, YisroelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/26/2022
Herzka, YisroelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/12/2022
Infinite Care Consulting Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023
Infinite Care Consulting Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/17/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Atrium at Navesink Harbor, the1.2 miRed Bank, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Complete Care at Shrewsbury LLC1.3 miShrewsbury, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
De la Salle Hall2.8 miLincroft, NJ★★★★★4/5
Shore Pointe Care Center3.3 miEatontown, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Jersey Shore Center4.7 miEatontown, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Careone at Middletown5.5 miAtlantic Highlands, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Monmouth, LLC5.9 miLong Branch, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Careone at Holmdel6.5 miHolmdel, NJ★★★★★4/5
Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation Center6.7 miHazlet, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Complete Care at Bayshore LLC7.6 miHolmdel, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Continuing Care at Seabrook7.9 miTinton Falls, NJ★★★★★5/5
Aster Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center7.9 miTinton Falls, NJ★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Red Bank →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315286.