How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Redbank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing
100 Chapin Avenue, Red Bank, NJ 07701 (opens Google Maps) · Monmouth County · (732) 741-8811· 180 certified beds · avg 166 residents/day · certified since Sep 22, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: INFINITE CARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 27, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.82
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 29 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 29 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Oct 28, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 14).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 14
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 14 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.82
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.31
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.60
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.82 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in New Jersey; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.31 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 8% in New Jersey; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.60 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 4% in New Jersey; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 25% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.3 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 33% in New Jersey; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.8 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 50% in New Jersey; top 41% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.02, RN 0.33, weekend 2.78.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.02 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Redbank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH RB Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 23% | 07/17/2023 |
| CW RB Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 23% | 07/17/2023 |
| CZH Investments LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| Herzka, Chaim | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| Koi Equities LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| RB SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/17/2023 |
| Seam Ny 2020 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 48% | 07/17/2023 |
| SK RB Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| Ahmad, Nasir | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| Ahmad, Nasir | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2024 |
| American Plan Administrators LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| Berkowitz, Michael | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2017 |
| Berkowitz, Michael | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| Capital Finance LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
| CH RB Holdings LLC | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| Herzka, Chaim | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2016 |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2022 |
| Herzka, Yisroel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/12/2022 |
| Infinite Care Consulting Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
| Infinite Care Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/17/2023 |
Showing 20 of 56 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 36 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Infinite Care — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Buena Vida Rehab and Nursing Center — Brooklyn, NY · overall 3/5
- Clove Lakes Health Care and Rehabilitation Center, — Staten Island, NY · overall 2/5abuse
- Golden Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Kingston, NY · overall 3/5
- Hudson Hill Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing — Yonkers, NY · overall 1/5abuse
- Sarah Neuman Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing — Mamaroneck, NY · overall 2/5
- Yonkers Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehab — Yonkers, NY · overall 1/5
- Forest Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Newark, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 56 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 70 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrium at Navesink Harbor, the | 1.2 mi | Red Bank, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Shrewsbury LLC | 1.3 mi | Shrewsbury, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| De la Salle Hall | 2.8 mi | Lincroft, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Shore Pointe Care Center | 3.3 mi | Eatontown, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Jersey Shore Center | 4.7 mi | Eatontown, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Careone at Middletown | 5.5 mi | Atlantic Highlands, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Monmouth, LLC | 5.9 mi | Long Branch, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Careone at Holmdel | 6.5 mi | Holmdel, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 6.7 mi | Hazlet, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Bayshore LLC | 7.6 mi | Holmdel, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Continuing Care at Seabrook | 7.9 mi | Tinton Falls, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aster Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 7.9 mi | Tinton Falls, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Monmouth, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Sunnyside Manor — Wall, NJ · overall 5/5
- Tower Lodge Care Center — Wall, NJ · overall 5/5
- Wedgwood Gardens Care Center — Freehold, NJ · overall 4/5
- Allaire Rehab & Nursing — Freehold, NJ · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Anchor Care and Rehabilitation Center — Hazlet, NJ · overall 4/5
- Applewood Village, INC — Freehold, NJ · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315286.