ArizonaMesa

Mi Casa Nursing Center

330 South Pinnule Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206 · Maricopa County · 180 certified beds · avg 99 residents/day · certified since Nov 27, 1985

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA (194 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Apr 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Apr 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
Jan 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jan 3, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jan 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jun 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 20, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 20, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 20, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Apr 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
Apr 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Apr 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Apr 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202270E
202310D
202420D
2025120E
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.803.973.95top 43% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.770.690.69top 29% in Arizona; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.413.503.50top 38% in Arizona; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.750.490.48top 16% in Arizona; top 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.345.245.8bottom 29% in Arizona; bottom 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.343.642.9top 25% in Arizona; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.84, RN 0.78, weekend 3.45. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Developers Investment Company INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1993
Butner, NancyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2018
Butner, NancyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2018
Cross, CindyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/21/1994
Developers Investment Company INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1993
Fletcher, ToddIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2024
Henry, TerryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/16/1999
Jean-Baptiste, RonaldIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Jean-Baptiste, RonaldIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/15/2025
Jean-Baptiste, RonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2025
Lay, LisaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/09/2018
Life Care Affiliates IIOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1993
Life Care Affiliates IIOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/1993
Life Care Affiliates IIOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2009
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1988
Life Care Centers of America, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Majercin, DonnaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2021
Majercin, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/05/2021
Mesa United Medical Investors Limited PartnershipOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/1988
Mesa United Medical Investors Limited PartnershipOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2009

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mission Palms Post Acute0.6 miMesa, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Desert Blossom Health & Rehab Center0.6 miMesa, AZ★★★★★4/5
Advanced Healthcare of Mesa0.7 miMesa, AZ★★★★★5/5
Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation1.0 miMesa, AZ★★★★★5/5
Citadel Post Acute1.2 miMesa, AZ★★★★★5/5
Springdale Village Post Acute1.7 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Montecito Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation1.8 miMesa, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Sante of Mesa2.5 miMesa, AZ★★★★★5/5
Citrus Heights Respiratory and Rehabilitation3.5 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Apache Junction Health Center7.6 miApache Junction, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Sandridge Post Acute8.3 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Wellsprings of Gilbert8.7 miGilbert, AZ★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mesa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035120.