How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Haven Health Green Valley, LLC
150 North La Canada Drive, Green Valley, AZ 85614 (opens Google Maps) · Pima County · (520) 625-0178· 111 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 5, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. F-0637
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. F-0584
View all 27 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · F-0680 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| May 23, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Apr 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Jan 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 15
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 15 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityArizona averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.45
Arizona average: 3.97
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.40
Arizona average: 0.69
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.06
Arizona average: 3.50
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.45 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 34% in Arizona; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.69 | bottom 15% in Arizona; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.06 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 34% in Arizona; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 26% in Arizona; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 18.4 | 45.2 | 45.8 | top 2% in Arizona; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 14.3 | 43.6 | 42.9 | top 6% in Arizona; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.22, RN 0.38, weekend 2.86.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.22 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Haven Health Green Valley, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robertson, Brett | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Samuelian, Robert | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Samuelian, Stephen | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Seastrand, Jason | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| West, Christian | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Eaglen, Robyn | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Eaglen, Robyn | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
| Eaglen, Robyn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Hatch, Brandon | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Hatch, Brandon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/03/2025 |
| Hatch, Brandon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Haven Green Valley Real Estate LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/02/2023 |
| Haven Green Valley Real Estate LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
Showing 20 of 43 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 23 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Haven Health — 20 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Haven Health Prescott, LLC — Prescott, AZ · overall 4/5
- Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC — Phoenix, AZ · overall 2/5
- Haven of Camp Verde — Camp Verde, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Haven of Cottonwood — Cottonwood, AZ · overall 2/5
- Haven of Douglas — Douglas, AZ · overall 4/5
- Haven of Flagstaff — Flagstaff, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Haven of Globe — Globe, AZ · overall 1/5abuse
- Haven of Lake Havasu — Lake Havasu City, AZ · overall 2/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 19 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Who runs your activities program, what are their qualifications, and can I see this week's activity calendar?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Arizona midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 18% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 43 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandstone of Tucson Rehab Centre | 21.1 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Arizona State Veteran Home-Tucson | 21.2 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Park Avenue Health and Rehabilitation Center | 25.9 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Haven of Saguaro Valley | 25.9 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Santa Rosa Care Center | 26.4 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 26.5 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pueblo Springs Rehabilitation Center | 26.6 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation & Care Center | 26.7 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 26.8 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Handmaker Home for the Aging | 26.9 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Foothills Rehabilitation Center | 26.9 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sandstone Estates Rehab Centre | 27.2 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Pima, AZ — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Haven of Tucson — Tucson, AZ · overall 2/5
- La Canada Care Center — Tucson, AZ · overall 2/5
- Life Care Center of Tucson — Tucson, AZ · overall 1/5
- Mountain View Care Center — Tucson, AZ · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035073.