ArizonaGreen Valley

Haven Health Green Valley, LLC

150 North La Canada Drive, Green Valley, AZ 85614 · Pima County · 111 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1981

Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Apr 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Jan 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 13, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jan 13, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023150E
2024100E
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.453.973.95bottom 34% in Arizona; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.690.69bottom 15% in Arizona; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.063.503.50bottom 34% in Arizona; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.490.48bottom 26% in Arizona; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)18.445.245.8top 2% in Arizona; top 2% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.343.642.9top 6% in Arizona; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.22, RN 0.38, weekend 2.86. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Robertson, BrettIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Samuelian, RobertIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Samuelian, SpencerIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Samuelian, StephenIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Seastrand, JasonIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
West, ChristianIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Eaglen, RobynIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Eaglen, RobynIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2025
Eaglen, RobynIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2025
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2024
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2025
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2025
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2025
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2025
Hatch, BrandonIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Hatch, BrandonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/03/2025
Hatch, BrandonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2025
Haven Green Valley Real Estate LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/02/2023
Haven Green Valley Real Estate LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sandstone of Tucson Rehab Centre21.1 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Arizona State Veteran Home-Tucson21.2 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆3/5
Park Avenue Health and Rehabilitation Center25.9 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Haven of Saguaro Valley25.9 miTucson, AZ★★★★★4/5
Santa Rosa Care Center26.4 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation26.5 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Pueblo Springs Rehabilitation Center26.6 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆3/5
Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation & Care Center26.7 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation26.8 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Handmaker Home for the Aging26.9 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Foothills Rehabilitation Center26.9 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5
Sandstone Estates Rehab Centre27.2 miTucson, AZ★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Green Valley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035073.