How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC
1880 East Van Buren Street, Phoenix, AZ 85006 (opens Google Maps) · Maricopa County · (602) 253-4570· 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Feb 3, 2016 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 13, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.71
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 36 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
View all 36 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 13, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Nov 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 13, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Aug 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 24, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Oct 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Aug 1, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint · F-0622 |
| May 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| May 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| May 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| May 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| May 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| May 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| May 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| May 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| May 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| May 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| May 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members. · F-0940 |
| Apr 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jan 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate its staff on residents' rights and the facility's responsibilities toward residents. Staff can only respect rights they've been taught about. · F-0942 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943 |
| Dec 15, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not include required infection control training — with written standards, policies, and procedures — as part of its infection prevention program. · F-0945 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 17
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 17 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityArizona averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.71
Arizona average: 3.97
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.28
Arizona average: 0.69
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.51
Arizona average: 3.50
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.71 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 2% in Arizona; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.28 | 0.69 | 0.69 | bottom 5% in Arizona; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.51 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 5% in Arizona; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 27% in Arizona; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.1 | 45.2 | 45.8 | top 30% in Arizona; top 39% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 45.0 | 43.6 | 42.9 | bottom 48% in Arizona; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.31, RN 0.44, weekend 3.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Haven Health Sky Harbor, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haven Health Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 08/01/2023 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 08/01/2023 |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Seastrand, Jason | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Brady, Mitchell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2025 |
| Brady, Mitchell | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2025 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Greiner, Russell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2023 |
| Greiner, Russell | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2023 |
| Haven Health Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
| Haven Sky Harbor Real Estate LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
| Knight, Tashay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2025 |
| Knight, Tashay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2025 |
Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Haven Health — 20 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Haven of Camp Verde — Camp Verde, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Haven of Cottonwood — Cottonwood, AZ · overall 2/5
- Haven of Douglas — Douglas, AZ · overall 4/5
- Haven of Flagstaff — Flagstaff, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Haven of Globe — Globe, AZ · overall 1/5abuse
- Haven of Lake Havasu — Lake Havasu City, AZ · overall 2/5abuse
- Haven of Lakeside — Lakeside, AZ · overall 1/5
- Haven of Phoenix — Phoenix, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 19 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Arizona midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 41% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 35 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 66 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desert Terrace Healthcare Center | 1.8 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Desert Haven Care Center | 2.3 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Camelback Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation | 3.7 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Resolve Harmony Center, LLC | 4.1 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Haven of Phoenix | 4.7 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| South Mountain Post Acute | 5.6 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Maryland Gardens Post Acute | 5.8 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Mirabella at Asu | 6.1 mi | Tempe, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Desert Peak Care Center | 6.2 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Rehabilitation Center at the Palazzo | 6.3 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rehab at Scottsdale Village Square | 6.6 mi | Scottsdale, AZ | —/5 | abuseSFF | |
| The Terraces of Phoenix | 6.6 mi | Phoenix, AZ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Maricopa, AZ — 77 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Haven of Scottsdale — Scottsdale, AZ · overall 2/5
- Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale — Scottsdale, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Horizon Post Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Glendale, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Immanuel Campus of Care — Peoria, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Lake Pleasant Post Acute Rehabilitation Center — Peoria, AZ · overall 4/5
- Life Care Center of North Glendale — Glendale, AZ · overall 5/5
- Life Care Center of Paradise Valley — Phoenix, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035290.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).