ArizonaGlobe

Haven of Globe

1100 Monroe Street, Globe, AZ 85501 · Gila County · 104 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Feb 23, 1996

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.08
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Jul 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 1, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Feb 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Feb 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Aug 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 18, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
202430D
202550E
2026110E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.083.973.95bottom 10% in Arizona; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.460.690.69bottom 29% in Arizona; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.633.503.50bottom 8% in Arizona; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.490.48top 50% in Arizona; top 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.745.245.8bottom 26% in Arizona; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.543.642.9bottom 47% in Arizona; bottom 43% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.83, RN 0.43, weekend 2.42. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Robertson, BrettIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2015
Samuelian, RobertIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2015
Samuelian, SpencerIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2015
Samuelian, StephenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2015
Seastrand, JasonIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2015
West, ChristianIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2015
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2024
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2025
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/08/2025
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Globe-Yuma Real Estate PartnersOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Globe-Yuma Real Estate PartnersOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Haven Globe Real Estate LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Haven Globe Real Estate LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2017
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2025
Kung, ShuIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Kung, ShuIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heritage Health Care Center0.6 miGlobe, AZ★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Globe →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035233.