Haven of Globe
1100 Monroe Street, Globe, AZ 85501 · Gila County · 104 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Feb 23, 1996
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jul 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint |
| Jul 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jul 1, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Jun 10, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jun 10, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jun 10, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint |
| Jun 10, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Jun 10, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Apr 2, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Feb 4, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint |
| Feb 4, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| May 18, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 11 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.08 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 10% in Arizona; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.69 | bottom 29% in Arizona; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.63 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 8% in Arizona; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 50% in Arizona; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.7 | 45.2 | 45.8 | bottom 26% in Arizona; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 45.5 | 43.6 | 42.9 | bottom 47% in Arizona; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.83, RN 0.43, weekend 2.42. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robertson, Brett | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2015 |
| Samuelian, Robert | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2015 |
| Samuelian, Spencer | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2015 |
| Samuelian, Stephen | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2015 |
| Seastrand, Jason | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2015 |
| West, Christian | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2015 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/14/2024 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Espinosa, Stephanie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Fragoso, Lindsay | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/10/2021 |
| Globe-Yuma Real Estate Partners | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Globe-Yuma Real Estate Partners | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Haven Globe Real Estate LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Haven Globe Real Estate LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2017 |
| Health Group Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2025 |
| Kung, Shu | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
| Kung, Shu | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2023 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Health Care Center | 0.6 mi | Globe, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 1 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035233.