ArizonaLake Havasu City

Haven of Lake Havasu

2781 Osborne Drive, Lake Havasu City, AZ 86406 · Mohave County · 104 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Feb 14, 1997

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: HAVEN HEALTH (20 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$8,018
Fines, last 3 years
3.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 14, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 7, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 17, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 25, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Dec 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Jun 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility hired someone with an official finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft against them. Facilities are not allowed to employ people with such findings.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jun 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 9, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jun 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 9, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202250E
202390E
202441G ▲
202581G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,018.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 17, 2024Fine$8,018

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.003.973.95bottom 7% in Arizona; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.590.690.69bottom 49% in Arizona; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.723.503.50bottom 13% in Arizona; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.490.48bottom 46% in Arizona; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.545.245.8bottom 24% in Arizona; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)60.043.642.9bottom 20% in Arizona; bottom 22% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.66, weekend 3.06. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Robertson, BrettIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017
Samuelian, RobertIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017
Samuelian, SpencerIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017
Samuelian, StephenIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017
Seastrand, JasonIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017
West, ChristianIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2024
Espinosa, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/14/2024
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2020
Fragoso, LindsayIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2021
Haven Health Properties LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017
Haven Health Properties LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Haven Lake Havasu Real Estate LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2017
Haven Lake Havasu Real Estate LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/26/2024
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Health Group Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2024
Longhurst, StockIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2020
Longhurst, StockIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2020
Ong-Veloso, AngeloIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Ong-Veloso, AngeloIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Havasu Nursing Center1.8 miLake Havasu City, AZ★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Lake Havasu City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035240.