How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Manhattanview Ctr for Rehabilitation and Healthcar
3200 Hudson Avenue, Union City, NJ 07087 (opens Google Maps) · Hudson County · (201) 325-8400· 127 certified beds · avg 122 residents/day · certified since Nov 9, 2000 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PARAMOUNT CARE CENTERS (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Dec 19, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.15
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). F-0742
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| May 17, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 17, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742 |
| May 17, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| May 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| May 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| May 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| May 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| May 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| May 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| May 17, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Sep 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Mar 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Mar 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Mar 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
Inspection trend by year
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 11 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.15
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.35
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.86
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.15 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.35 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 12% in New Jersey; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.86 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 13% in New Jersey; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 29% in New Jersey; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.2 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 34% in New Jersey; top 48% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 43.8 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 35% in New Jersey; bottom 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.37, weekend 3.05.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.37 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Manhattanview Ctr for Rehabilitation and Healthcar. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deutsch, Shlomo | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| Friedman, Allen | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2022 |
| Friedman, Jerry | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 04/01/2022 |
| Friedman, Nathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 9% | 04/01/2022 |
| Kraus, Abraham | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 50% | 04/01/2022 |
| Cohen, Nathan | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2022 |
All 6 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Paramount Care Centers — 10 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Sinai Post-Acute Nursing & Rehab Center — Newark, NJ · overall 1/5
- Ivory Wellness Center — Norristown, PA · overall 2/5
- Onyx Wellness Center — Norristown, PA · overall 1/5
- River's Edge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Philadelphia, PA · overall 4/5
- The Pines at Philadelphia Rehab and Healthcare Ctr — Philadelphia, PA · overall 5/5
- Alameda Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Perth Amboy, NJ · overall 4/5
- Brookhaven Health Care Center — East Orange, NJ · overall 3/5
- Echelon Care & Rehab — Voorhees, NJ · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 9 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Does a pharmacist review every resident's medications and chart monthly, and how are their concerns acted on?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What mental health services do you offer on-site, and how do you care for residents with depression, anxiety, or a history of trauma?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
- "If my family member goes to the hospital, how long will you hold their bed, and will we get that in writing?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 299 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optima Care Castle Hill | 0.4 mi | Union City, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Harbour View Senior Living Corp | 1.6 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Optima Care Fountains | 1.9 mi | Secaucus, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Hoboken University Medical Center Tcu | 2.0 mi | Hoboken, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Optima Care Harborview | 2.3 mi | Jersey City, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Harborage LLC | 2.4 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Riverside | 2.9 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Hudsonview Health Care Center | 2.9 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Alaris Health at Hamilton Park | 3.0 mi | Jersey City, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| West Village Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.1 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Peace Care St Joseph's | 3.1 mi | Jersey City, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.3 mi | New York City, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hudson, NJ — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Peace Care St Ann's — Jersey City, NJ · overall 2/5
- Acclaim Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Jersey City, NJ · overall 4/5
- Alaris Health at Belgrove — Kearny, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315465.