Alameda Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
303 Elm Street, Perth Amboy, NJ 08861 · Middlesex County · 250 certified beds · avg 223 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1982
Part of chain: PARAMOUNT CARE CENTERS (10 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (27)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Jul 3, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jul 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the building. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Dec 21, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Nov 3, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 9).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.93 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 33% in New Jersey; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.19 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in New Jersey; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.50 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 38% in New Jersey; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.11 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 2% in New Jersey; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.5 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in New Jersey; top 43% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 53.3 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 20% in New Jersey; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.29, RN 0.16, weekend 2.93. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alameda Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/20/2016 |
| Blonder, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 04/20/2016 |
| Frankel, Eliyahu | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/20/2016 |
| Mendlowitz, Moshe | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 30% | 04/20/2016 |
| Frankel, Eliyahu | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/20/2016 |
| Kraus, Abraham | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/20/2016 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring Creek Healthcare Center | 1.7 mi | Perth Amboy, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Venetian Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 2.1 mi | South Amboy, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Joseph's Home Al & NC, INC | 3.4 mi | Woodbridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| New Jersey Veterans Memorial Home Menlo | 4.2 mi | Edison, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Roosevelt Care Center | 4.3 mi | Edison, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brighton Gardens of Edison | 5.9 mi | Edison, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Complete Care at Madison, LLC | 6.6 mi | Matawan, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Adroit Care Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 6.8 mi | Rahway, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hartwyck at Oak Tree | 6.9 mi | Edison, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Care Connection Rahway | 7.1 mi | Rahway, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Embassy Manor at Edison Nursing and Rehabilitation | 7.3 mi | Edison, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Anchor Care and Rehabilitation Center | 7.5 mi | Hazlet, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Perth Amboy →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315180.