1049 Burnt Tavern Road, Brick, NJ 08724 (opens Google Maps) · Ocean County · (732) 840-3700· 164 certified beds · avg 151 residents/day · certified since Jan 18, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 12, 2024 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Jul 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Jul 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint · F-0583 |
| Jul 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jul 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint · F-0760 |
| Nov 3, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Dec 20, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 20, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 20, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 20, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 20, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | B |
| 2024 | 9 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 11 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $8,512.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2024 | Fine | $8,512 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.23 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 19% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 45% in New Jersey; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.81 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 10% in New Jersey; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 37% in New Jersey; top 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 31.3 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 38% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.16, RN 0.58, weekend 2.75.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.16 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Willow Springs Rehabilitation and Healthcare Cente. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2014 |
| Kohn Fam Tr GST Exempt Uad 3-25-13 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2025 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Pramnauth, Omkar | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2025 |
| Pramnauth, Omkar | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2025 |
| Pramnauth, Omkar | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2025 |
| Pramnauth, Omkar | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2025 |
| Quinto Guardian LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/14/2019 |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/13/2017 |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2025 |
| Rosenblum, Eliyahu | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Rosenblum, Eliyahu | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Rothberg, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Rothberg, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2022 |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| SK 2013 Investment Tr Ua 03252013 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Laurelton, LLC | 1.0 mi | Brick, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Brick LLC | 1.2 mi | Brick, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Concord Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 2.6 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Wall | 3.1 mi | Allenwood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Crest Pointe Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 3.9 mi | Pt Pleasant, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sunnyside Manor | 4.0 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Atlantic Coast Rehab & Health | 4.8 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Fountainview Care Center | 4.8 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Complete Care at Shorrock | 4.9 mi | Brick, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation | 5.3 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Harrogate Village | 5.3 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Wall LLC | 5.8 mi | Wall, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Ocean, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315213.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details