New JerseyManchester

Aristacare at Manchester LLC

1770 Tobias Avenue, Manchester, NJ 08759 · Ocean County · 165 certified beds · avg 147 residents/day · certified since Oct 7, 1983

Part of chain: ARISTACARE (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$62,826
Fines, last 3 years
3.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Apr 26, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 9, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
Apr 26, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 16, 2021B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202120D
202481J ▲
202570D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $62,826.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 26, 2024Fine$62,826

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.583.883.95bottom 45% in New Jersey; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.410.670.69bottom 24% in New Jersey; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.313.533.50top 50% in New Jersey; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.500.48bottom 22% in New Jersey; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.839.745.8bottom 35% in New Jersey; top 47% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)61.137.742.9bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.62, RN 0.41, weekend 3.34. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Greenberger, SidneyIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest37%02/26/2014
Klein, ZviIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest37%02/26/2014
Weisel, MorrisIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%02/26/2014
Rosado, JacquelineIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Arbors2.1 miToms River, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Shore Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center3.3 miToms River, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Hampton Ridge Healthcare and Rehabilitation4.2 miToms River, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Childrens Specialized Hospital Toms River4.2 miToms River, NJ★★★★★4/5
Complete Care at Green Acres4.2 miToms River, NJ★★★★★5/5
Complete Care at Holiday City4.5 miToms River, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Community Medical Center Tcu4.8 miToms River, NJ★★★★★5/5
Harrogate Village5.3 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation5.3 miLakewood, NJ★★★★★4/5
Whiting Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center5.4 miWhiting, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Rose Garden Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.4 miToms River, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Skilled Nursing at Pine Village5.5 miWhiting, NJ★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Manchester →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315196.