Kearsley Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
2100 North 49th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19131 · Philadelphia County · 96 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Apr 10, 1996
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 16, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Apr 24, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 2, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 18, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 2, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 18, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (35)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint |
| May 20, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| May 20, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| May 20, 2026 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. |
| May 16, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Apr 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Apr 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care. · from a complaint |
| Apr 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Mar 12, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint |
| Mar 12, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Jan 22, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint |
| Nov 25, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint |
| Oct 2, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Oct 2, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jul 22, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Jul 22, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. |
| May 10, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| May 10, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Dec 6, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Oct 13, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint |
| Aug 10, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 15 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 13 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $12,185.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2024 | Fine | $12,185 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.05 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 14% in Pennsylvania; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 39% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.60 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 6% in Pennsylvania; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.69 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 24% in Pennsylvania; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.2 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 42% in Pennsylvania; top 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 35.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 44% in Pennsylvania; top 38% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.14, RN 1.00, weekend 3.53. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K Equities LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Kohn 2020 Descendants' Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Liberty Bell Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2024 |
| Quinto Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 49% | 01/01/2022 |
| Sora Kohn Fam Tr Uad 120120 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Ukr Consulting LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Yr 2013 Delta Tr Ua 03252013 | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 16% | 01/01/2022 |
| Galinkin, Brian | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2017 |
| Galinkin, Brian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2017 |
| Galinkin, Brian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2017 |
| Galinkin, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2017 |
| Kearsley Skilled Care LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2011 |
| Liberty Bell Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/07/2025 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/22/2017 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/08/2025 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2014 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
- "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simpson House INC | 0.2 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Inglis House | 0.4 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Monumentalpostacutecare at Woodside Park | 0.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Centennial Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 1.4 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saunders Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.0 mi | Wynnewood, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| West Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.1 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aristacare at East Falls | 2.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Rittenhouse Post Acute | 2.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Care Pavilion Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr | 2.9 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Renaissance Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 3.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Holy Family Home | 3.6 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Philadelphia →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395983.