How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1249 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10029 (opens Google Maps) · New York County · (212) 360-1000· 679 certified beds · avg 513 residents/day · certified since Aug 17, 1983 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ARCHCARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Oct 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Oct 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 6, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 31, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.63 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 39% in New York; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 29% in New York; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.26 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 34% in New York; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 26% in New York; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.6 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 47% in New York; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 47.0 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 30% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.68, weekend 3.03.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.38 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2014 |
| Augustine, Gemma | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Bernard, Rosalie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/15/2018 |
| Bernard, Rosalie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/13/2025 |
| Bujno, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Cahill, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Catholic Health Care Systems | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2005 |
| Cortes, Tara | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2019 |
| Covone, Annmarie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2010 |
| Covone, Annmarie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Fahey, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2010 |
| Feldmann, Eric | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2019 |
| Gleason, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Gray, Karen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Johnson, Clarion | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Kasergrande, Leslie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Kelleher, Rory | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/29/2010 |
| Lamorte, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| Larue, Scott | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/02/2024 |
| O'Brien, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/04/2019 |
Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Archcare — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The New Jewish Home, Manhattan | 0.7 mi | New York, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Henry J. Carter Skilled Nursing Facility | 0.8 mi | Manhattan, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp (1992) | 0.9 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Northern Manhattan Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent | 1.0 mi | New York, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.4 mi | New York City, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| St Mary's Center INC | 1.4 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Riverside | 1.5 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Harlem Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, L L | 1.6 mi | New York, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co INC | 1.9 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| New York Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing | 2.0 mi | Astoria, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Complete Care at Harborage LLC | 2.4 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Hudsonview Health Care Center | 2.5 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in New York, NY — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335665.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details