New YorkGoshen

Glen Arden INC

214 Harriman Drive, Goshen, NY 10924 · New York County · 40 certified beds · avg 32 residents/day · certified since Nov 26, 1996

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$108,046
Fines, last 3 years
5.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 22, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 16, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 2, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 22, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care.
Dec 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Jul 2, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not designate a physician to serve as medical director — the doctor responsible for overseeing resident care policies and coordinating medical care across the facility.
Jul 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jul 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 2, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Nov 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 14, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 14, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202230D
2024121G ▲
202561G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $108,046, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 2, 2024Fine$108,046
Jul 2, 2024Payment Denial10 days from Oct 2, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.673.583.95top 2% in New York; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.310.680.69top 5% in New York; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.153.133.50top 1% in New York; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.960.480.48top 8% in New York; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.040.345.8top 44% in New York; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)47.139.842.9bottom 30% in New York; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.17, RN 1.20, weekend 4.69. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alexander, JenniferIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020
Goldstein, BethIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020
Markopoulos, AnastasiosIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sapphire Nursing and Rehab at Goshen0.3 miGoshen, NY★★★★★4/5
The Valley View Center for Nursing Care and Rehab3.3 miGoshen, NY★★☆☆☆1/5
Campbell Hall Rehabilitation Center INC4.8 miCampbell Hall, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Middletown Park Rehab & Health Care Center5.5 miMiddletown, NY★★★★☆3/5
Highland Rehabilitation and Nursing Center7.0 miMiddletown, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Schervier Pavilion8.9 miWarwick, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Montgomery Nursing and Rehabilitation Center11.5 miMontgomery, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Sapphire Nursing at Meadow Hill15.4 miNewburgh, NY★★★★☆3/5
Fishkill Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing20.0 miBeacon, NY★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Goshen →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335802.