How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare
1412 Lansdowne Avenue, Darby, PA 19023 (opens Google Maps) · Delaware County · (610) 461-6510· 273 certified beds · avg 252 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1976 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 5, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 26 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint F-0552
The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. F-0559
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. F-0580
View all 26 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint · F-0552 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · F-0559 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · F-0838 |
| Jul 18, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Jul 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint · F-0557 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have firmly secured handrails on both sides of its hallways. · F-0924 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jan 9, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Dec 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 13 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.86
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.32
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.63
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.86 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 5% in Pennsylvania; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 3% in Pennsylvania; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.63 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 7% in Pennsylvania; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 17% in Pennsylvania; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 58.4 | 44.5 | 45.8 | bottom 14% in Pennsylvania; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 32.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 36% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.39, RN 0.37, weekend 3.12.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.39 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehm, Caroline | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/28/2023 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/28/2023 |
| Allen, Daniel | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2014 |
| Allen, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2014 |
| Allen, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2014 |
| Bauer, John | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2019 |
| Bauer, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2019 |
| Bauer, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2019 |
| Boehm, Caroline | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/28/2023 |
| Greystone Funding Company LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/30/2024 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/28/2023 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2014 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2014 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Marasco-Kennedy, Elizabeth | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2019 |
| Marasco-Kennedy, Elizabeth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2019 |
| Pearlstein, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2016 |
| Pearlstein, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2016 |
| Petroski, Edward | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/08/2018 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Center Management Group — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- St Martha Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Downingtown, PA · overall 5/5
- St Mary Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Lansdale, PA · overall 4/5
- Villa at Stamford, the — Stamford, CT · overall 4/5
- Bishop McCarthy Center for Rehab & Healthcare — Vineland, NJ · overall 2/5
- Lincoln Park Care Center — Lincoln Park, NJ · overall 1/5
- Lincoln Park Renaissance — Lincoln Park, NJ · overall 4/5
- Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Pleasantville, NJ · overall 4/5
- St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Cherry Hill, NJ · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "How do you handle room assignments and roommate requests, and do residents get advance written notice before any move?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 58% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 167 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Providence Rehab and Hlthcare Ctratmercyfitzgerald | 0.4 mi | Yeadon, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Little Flower Manor | 0.4 mi | Darby, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Edenbrook of Yeadon | 0.8 mi | Yeadon, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Holy Family Home | 2.6 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Care Pavilion Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.6 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Renaissance Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 3.2 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aventura at Prospect | 3.6 mi | Prospect Park, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| West Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 4.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Westgate Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Ctr | 4.1 mi | Havertown, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr | 4.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Centennial Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 4.4 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Springfield Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 4.5 mi | Springfield, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Delaware, PA — 28 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Sterling Health Care and Rehab Center — Media, PA · overall 2/5abuse
- Wallingford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cen — Wallingford, PA · overall 1/5
- Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab and SKD Nsg — Media, PA · overall 4/5
- William Hood Dunwoody Care Ctr — Newtown Square, PA · overall 5/5
- Willowbrooke Court SKD Care Center at Lima Estates — Lima, PA · overall 5/5
- Willowbrooke Court-Granite — Media, PA · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395282.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).