New JerseyLincoln Park

Lincoln Park Renaissance

521 Pine Brook Road, Lincoln Park, NJ 07035 · Morris County · 189 certified beds · avg 179 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Feb 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Oct 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Oct 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 25, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jul 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jul 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jul 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jul 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jul 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jul 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jul 25, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100F
2024100E
2026100E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.243.883.95bottom 20% in New Jersey; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.410.670.69bottom 23% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.943.533.50bottom 19% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.280.500.48bottom 24% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.139.745.8bottom 25% in New Jersey; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.837.742.9top 23% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.44, weekend 3.23. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Boehm, CarolineIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2023
Gros, Charles-EdouardIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2023
Klein, MiriamIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2023
Barravecchio, AnthonyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Barravecchio, AnthonyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Boehm, CarolineIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2023
Boehm, CarolineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2023
Chmura- Saez, PatriciaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Chmura- Saez, PatriciaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Chmura- Saez, PatriciaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Fleming, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/03/2019
Fleming, DonnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/03/2019
Gros, Charles-EdouardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2023
Klein, BaruchIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Klein, BaruchIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Klein, MiriamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/30/2023
Levi, ShlomoIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Levi, ShlomoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Levi, ShlomoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2019
Newport Real Estate Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lincoln Park Care Center0.1 miLincoln Park, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avalon Rehab and Care Center2.8 miWayne, NJ★★★☆☆4/5
Careone at Wayne3.4 miWayne, NJ★★★★★5/5
Atrium Post Acute Care of Wayne3.9 miWayne, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Complete Care at West Caldwell LLC4.2 miWest Caldwell, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center4.6 miWayne, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Arbor Glen Center4.7 miCedar Grove, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Cedar Crest/Mountainview Gardens4.9 miPompton Plains, NJ★★★★☆2/5abuse
Lutheran Social Ministries Cranes Mill5.1 miWest Caldwell, NJ★★★★★4/5
Complete Care at St Vincents LLC5.3 miCedar Grove, NJ★★★★★5/5
Complete Care at Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp Center5.6 miWayne, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Excel Care at Wayne5.7 miWayne, NJ★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lincoln Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315042.