How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Lincoln Park Renaissance
521 Pine Brook Road, Lincoln Park, NJ 07035 (opens Google Maps) · Morris County · (973) 696-3300· 189 certified beds · avg 179 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP (16 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 9, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. F-0755
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jul 25, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs. · F-0949 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 10).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 10 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.24
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.41
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.94
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.24 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 20% in New Jersey; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.41 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 23% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.94 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 19% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 24% in New Jersey; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 49.1 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in New Jersey; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 23.8 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 23% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.44, weekend 3.23.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.56 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Lincoln Park Renaissance. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehm, Caroline | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Klein, Miriam | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Barravecchio, Anthony | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Barravecchio, Anthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Boehm, Caroline | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Boehm, Caroline | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Chmura- Saez, Patricia | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2025 |
| Chmura- Saez, Patricia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2025 |
| Chmura- Saez, Patricia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/10/2025 |
| Fleming, Donna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2019 |
| Fleming, Donna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/03/2019 |
| Gros, Charles-Edouard | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Klein, Baruch | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Klein, Miriam | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/30/2023 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2019 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2019 |
| Levi, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2019 |
| Newport Real Estate Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2012 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Center Management Group — 16 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Our Ladys Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Pleasantville, NJ · overall 4/5
- St Mary's Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Cherry Hill, NJ · overall 3/5
- Bellhaven Center for Rehab and Nursing Care — Brookhaven, NY · overall 2/5
- Bensonhurst Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Dumont Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care — New Rochelle, NY · overall 3/5
- Hopkins Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Brooklyn, NY · overall 5/5
- Smithtown Center for Rehabilitation & Nursing Care — Smithtown, NY · overall 2/5
- Westhampton Care Center — Westhampton, NY · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 15 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
- "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 135 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln Park Care Center | 0.1 mi | Lincoln Park, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avalon Rehab and Care Center | 2.8 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Careone at Wayne | 3.4 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Atrium Post Acute Care of Wayne | 3.9 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at West Caldwell LLC | 4.2 mi | West Caldwell, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center | 4.6 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Arbor Glen Center | 4.7 mi | Cedar Grove, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cedar Crest/Mountainview Gardens | 4.9 mi | Pompton Plains, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lutheran Social Ministries Cranes Mill | 5.1 mi | West Caldwell, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at St Vincents LLC | 5.3 mi | Cedar Grove, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Complete Care at Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp Center | 5.6 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Excel Care at Wayne | 5.7 mi | Wayne, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Morris, NJ — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Livia Health and Senior Living — East Hanover, NJ · overall 5/5
- Merry Heart Nursing Home — Succasunna, NJ · overall 4/5
- Morris View Healthcare Center — Morristown, NJ · overall 2/5abuse
- Morristown Post Acute Rehab and Nursing Center — Morristown, NJ · overall 5/5
- Oaks at Denville, the — Denville, NJ · overall 4/5
- Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Madison, NJ · overall 5/5
- Troy Hills Center — Parsippany, NJ · overall 2/5
- Careone at Hanover Township — Whippany, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315042.