How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Providence Rehab and Hlthcare Ctratmercyfitzgerald
600 South Wycombe Ave, Yeadon, PA 19050 (opens Google Maps) · Delaware County · (610) 626-8065· 129 certified beds · avg 120 residents/day · certified since Jun 13, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 14, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.84
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
View all 27 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Apr 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Apr 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint · F-0694 |
| Apr 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Apr 1, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · F-0602 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 23, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623 |
| May 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint · F-0919 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 15
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 15 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.84
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.58
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.41
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.84 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 5% in Pennsylvania; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 40% in Pennsylvania; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.41 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 3% in Pennsylvania; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 43% in Pennsylvania; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.4 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 47% in Pennsylvania; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 21% in Pennsylvania; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.73, weekend 3.03.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Providence Rehab and Hlthcare Ctratmercyfitzgerald. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2018 |
| Hamid, Sammy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2018 |
| Hamid, Sammy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2018 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
| Moss, Erica | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/08/2021 |
| Moss, Erica | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/08/2021 |
| Moss, Erica | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/08/2021 |
| Moss, Erica | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/08/2021 |
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2021 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/09/2021 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
| Papada, Jonathan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2022 |
| Papada, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/18/2022 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2018 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2018 |
| Providence Leasehold LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2025 |
| Quinto Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2018 |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/2021 |
| Reliant Pro Rehab LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2025 |
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Rittenhouse Post Acute — Philadelphia, PA · overall 4/5
- Riverton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Allentown, PA · overall 5/5
- Roosevelt Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Philadelphia, PA · overall 2/5
- Springfield Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Springfield, PA · overall 2/5
- University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr — Philadelphia, PA · overall 3/5
- West Chester Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — West Chester, PA · overall 2/5
- Willow Grove Post Acute — Hatboro, PA · overall 3/5
- Yardley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Yardley, PA · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 43% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 27 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 168 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Francis Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 0.4 mi | Darby, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Edenbrook of Yeadon | 0.4 mi | Yeadon, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Little Flower Manor | 0.8 mi | Darby, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Care Pavilion Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Holy Family Home | 2.4 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Renaissance Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| West Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.6 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Westgate Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing Ctr | 3.8 mi | Havertown, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aventura at Prospect | 4.0 mi | Prospect Park, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr | 4.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Centennial Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 4.1 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Saunders Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.1 mi | Wynnewood, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Delaware, PA — 28 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Quadrangle — Haverford, PA · overall 2/5
- Rosemont Center — Rosemont, PA · overall 3/5
- Rosewood Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Broomall, PA · overall 5/5
- Springfield Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Springfield, PA · overall 2/5
- Sterling Health Care and Rehab Center — Media, PA · overall 2/5abuse
- Wallingford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cen — Wallingford, PA · overall 1/5
- Wesley Enhanced Living Main Line Rehab and SKD Nsg — Media, PA · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395989.