How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
St. Andrew Post-Acute Rehabilitation Center
16702 North Dale Mabry Hwy, Tampa, FL 33618 (opens Google Maps) · Hillsborough County · (813) 908-2333· 45 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since Nov 23, 1999 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PLAINVIEW HEALTHCARE PARTNERS (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 5, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Sep 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Sep 5, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Sep 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 5, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 9, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| May 27, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 27, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.62
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.88
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.51
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.62 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 13% in Florida; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 28% in Florida; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.51 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 9% in Florida; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.87 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 12% in Florida; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.7 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 49% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 44% in Florida; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.67, RN 0.89, weekend 4.55.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.67 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St. Andrew Post-Acute Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arem, Jeffrey | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Herskowitz, David | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Moskowitz, Isaac | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Rubenstein, David | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Tampa FL Holdco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Dilella, Vincent | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/08/2023 |
| Dilella, Vincent | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/08/2023 |
| Herskowitz, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Herskowitz, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Jones, Aileen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2025 |
| Jones, Aileen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2025 |
All 11 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Plainview Healthcare Partners — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Good Shepherd Health and Rehabilitation — Phelps, KY · overall 1/5
- Andersonville TN Opco LLC — Andersonville, TN · overall 3/5
- Beech Tree Health and Rehabilitation — Jellico, TN · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Church Hill Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Church Hill, TN · overall —/5SFF
- Countryside Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Lawrenceburg, TN · overall 3/5
- Huntsville Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Huntsville, TN · overall 2/5
- Newport TN Opco LLC — Newport, TN · overall 3/5
- Orchardview Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Kingsport, TN · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 58 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northdale Rehabilitation Center | 1.8 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pruitthealth-North Tampa, LLC | 2.9 mi | Lutz, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Tampa Lakes Health and Rehabilitation Center | 3.1 mi | Lutz, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Luxe at Lutz Rehabilitation Center (the) | 3.2 mi | Lutz, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at Fletcher | 3.7 mi | Tampa, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Carrollwood Care Center | 4.2 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Bristol Care Center | 4.8 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Palm Garden of Tampa | 5.8 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Excel Care Center | 5.8 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Blue Palms Health and Rehabilitation Center at Fle | 6.0 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fairway Oaks Center | 6.3 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at the Bay | 8.7 mi | Tampa, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hillsborough, FL — 30 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Sun Terrace Health Care Center — Sun City Center, FL · overall 4/5
- Victoria Crossing Rehabilitation Center — Brandon, FL · overall 4/5
- Vivo Healthcare Gandy — Tampa, FL · overall 2/5
- Whispering Oaks — Tampa, FL · overall 3/5
- Woodbridge Care Center and Rehab — Tampa, FL · overall 3/5
- Ybor City Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Tampa, FL · overall 3/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106015.