FloridaTampa

Fairway Oaks Center

13806 N 46th St, Tampa, FL 33613 · Hillsborough County · 120 certified beds · avg 105 residents/day · certified since Jul 13, 1977

Part of chain: ASTON HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 21, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 1, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Apr 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Apr 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Apr 15, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 12).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150D
202270D
2024140E
202530E
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.434.033.95bottom 11% in Florida; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.570.760.69bottom 33% in Florida; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.123.683.50bottom 8% in Florida; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.340.530.48bottom 29% in Florida; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)61.541.445.8bottom 8% in Florida; bottom 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)74.146.042.9bottom 8% in Florida; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.60, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fairway Oaks Holdco LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2023
Friedman, LeopoldIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2023
Gutman, SamuelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Lce Partners LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Agbaneje Sterlin, EmmanuelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/05/2025
Aston Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2025
Guerrero Cueto, RamonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2025
Harris, TomikaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/18/2025
Legendary, ZechariahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/19/2024
Legendary, ZechariahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2025
Thacker, TriciaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/04/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Blue Palms Health and Rehabilitation Center at Fle0.4 miTampa, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Palm Garden of Tampa0.6 miTampa, FL★★★★☆3/5
Excel Care Center1.4 miTampa, FL★★★★☆3/5
The Bristol Care Center1.8 miTampa, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Tampa Lakes Health and Rehabilitation Center3.2 miLutz, FL★★★★☆3/5
Aviata at Fletcher3.3 miTampa, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Northdale Rehabilitation Center5.3 miTampa, FL★★★★☆3/5
St. Andrew Post-Acute Rehabilitation Center6.3 miTampa, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Whispering Oaks6.4 miTampa, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Elon Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center7.3 miTampa, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Luxe at Lutz Rehabilitation Center (the)7.4 miLutz, FL★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pruitthealth-North Tampa, LLC7.5 miLutz, FL★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tampa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105305.