FloridaLutz

Luxe at Lutz Rehabilitation Center (the)

19091 N Dale Mabry Hwy, Lutz, FL 33548 · Hillsborough County · 120 certified beds · avg 115 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 2012

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$50,225
Fines, last 3 years
0.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 7, 2025 · F-0695 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
May 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
May 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint
Feb 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.
Feb 4, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Feb 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 4, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 30, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 30, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202020E
202270E
202320D
202480E
202561G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $50,225.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 7, 2025Fine$50,225

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)0.004.033.95
Registered Nurse hours0.000.760.69
Weekend total nurse staffing0.003.683.50
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.000.530.48
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.041.445.8
RN turnover (%)0.046.042.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 0.00, RN 0.00, weekend 0.00. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gutman, SamuelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/13/2020
Lutz Rehab Holding Partners LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/13/2020
Aston Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Cyr, DanielleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/14/2025
Cyr, DanielleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2026
Fleurantin, MarieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2026
Hashmi, HaseebIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2023
Hashmi, HaseebIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2026
Parks, BaileyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLENO DATE PROVIDED
Wildes, DonnaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2025
Wildes, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2025
Wildes, DonnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pruitthealth-North Tampa, LLC0.4 miLutz, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
St. Andrew Post-Acute Rehabilitation Center3.2 miTampa, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Tampa Lakes Health and Rehabilitation Center4.4 miLutz, FL★★★★☆3/5
Northdale Rehabilitation Center4.8 miTampa, FL★★★★☆3/5
Aviata at Fletcher6.1 miTampa, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Bristol Care Center6.6 miTampa, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Palm Garden of Tampa7.0 miTampa, FL★★★★☆3/5
Carrollwood Care Center7.1 miTampa, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Baldomero Lopez Memorial Veterans Nursing Home7.2 miLand O Lakes, FL★★★★★4/5
Blue Palms Health and Rehabilitation Center at Fle7.4 miTampa, FL★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lutz →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 106093.