FloridaTampa

Vivo Healthcare Gandy

4610 S Manhattan Ave, Tampa, FL 33611 · Hillsborough County · 160 certified beds · avg 144 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1984

Part of chain: VIVO HEALTHCARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 27, 2026 · F-0578 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.

Why it matters: Ignoring these rights means residents may receive treatments they refused, or miss having their end-of-life wishes respected.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jan 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 3, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Nov 3, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 3, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Nov 3, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 20, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 20, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
May 20, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 20, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
May 20, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
May 20, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202160E
202240D
202570D
202661J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.864.033.95bottom 49% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.760.69bottom 41% in Florida; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.483.683.50bottom 45% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.370.530.48bottom 35% in Florida; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.741.445.8top 44% in Florida; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)54.546.042.9bottom 33% in Florida; bottom 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.67, RN 0.58, weekend 3.32. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
5 Moshes Realty LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Aml Carolina LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Ayc Investments LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Becker, YitzchokIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Compton, MordechaiIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Cukier, AvrohomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
David, MiriamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
David, TovaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Dieguez, JessicaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Elef Investments LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Elieman Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Gandy Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/01/2025
Gluck, BenjaminIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest9%07/01/2025
Jakobovits, ElieIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Jakobovits, NathanIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Jek Irrv Tr IIOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%07/01/2025
Kagan, JeffreyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Landsman, DvoraIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Levy, ElieIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Librowicz, EmanuelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bayshore Pointe Nursing and Rehab Center1.4 miTampa, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Canterbury Towers INC1.9 miTampa, FL★★★★★4/5
Ybor City Center for Rehabilitation and Healing5.9 miTampa, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center of Tampa6.2 miTampa, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Aviata at the Bay6.4 miTampa, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Elon Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center6.8 miTampa, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Whispering Oaks7.7 miTampa, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Aventura at the Bay7.7 miSaint Petersburg, FL—/5abuseSFF
Shore Acres Care Center and Rehab7.7 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Brighton Bay Center for Rehabilitation and Healing7.8 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Woodbridge Care Center and Rehab8.3 miTampa, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Vivo Healthcare St Petersburg8.6 miSaint Petersburg, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tampa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105491.