TennesseeLawrenceburg

Countryside Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center

3051 Buffalo Road, Lawrenceburg, TN 38464 · Lawrence County · 162 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Mar 18, 1992

Part of chain: PLAINVIEW HEALTHCARE PARTNERS (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Sep 10, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 10, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Dec 18, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 18, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 18, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940E
202190F
202620E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTennessee avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.453.623.95bottom 48% in Tennessee; bottom 34% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.200.570.69bottom 1% in Tennessee; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.993.153.50bottom 47% in Tennessee; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.150.390.48bottom 4% in Tennessee; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.248.945.8top 25% in Tennessee; top 37% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.143.242.9bottom 25% in Tennessee; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.21, weekend 3.17. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Amoyelle, YechezkelIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2023
Countryside TN Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%08/01/2023
Fogel, JoshuaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2023
Weiss, NaftaliIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2023
WF Countryside TN LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2023
Fogel, JoshuaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Fogel, JoshuaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Wallace, SaraIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Weiss, NaftaliIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Weiss, NaftaliIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
NHC Healthcare, Scott1.8 miLawrenceburg, TN★★★★★5/5
NHC Healthcare, Lawrenceburg3.5 miLawrenceburg, TN★★★★★4/5
Mt Pleasant Healthcare and Rehabilitation18.4 miMount Pleasant, TN★★★☆☆3/5
Lewis Park Post Acute19.3 miHohenwald, TN★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lawrenceburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445280.