How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Countryside Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center
3051 Buffalo Road, Lawrenceburg, TN 38464 (opens Google Maps) · Lawrence County · (931) 762-7518· 162 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Mar 18, 1992 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PLAINVIEW HEALTHCARE PARTNERS (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.1★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 25, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.45
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. F-0791
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 15 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Sep 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Dec 18, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 18, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2021
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2021 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTennessee averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.45
Tennessee average: 3.62
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.20
Tennessee average: 0.57
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.99
Tennessee average: 3.15
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Tennessee avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.45 | 3.62 | 3.95 | bottom 48% in Tennessee; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.20 | 0.57 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Tennessee; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.99 | 3.15 | 3.50 | bottom 47% in Tennessee; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.15 | 0.39 | 0.48 | bottom 4% in Tennessee; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.2 | 48.9 | 45.8 | top 25% in Tennessee; top 37% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 43.2 | 42.9 | bottom 25% in Tennessee; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.21, weekend 3.17.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.66 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Countryside Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amoyelle, Yechezkel | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2023 |
| Countryside TN Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/01/2023 |
| Fogel, Joshua | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2023 |
| Weiss, Naftali | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2023 |
| WF Countryside TN LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/01/2023 |
| Fogel, Joshua | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Fogel, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Wallace, Sara | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Weiss, Naftali | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
| Weiss, Naftali | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2023 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Plainview Healthcare Partners — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Huntsville Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Huntsville, TN · overall 2/5
- Newport TN Opco LLC — Newport, TN · overall 3/5
- Orchardview Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Kingsport, TN · overall 2/5
- St. Andrew Post-Acute Rehabilitation Center — Tampa, FL · overall 2/5
- Good Shepherd Health and Rehabilitation — Phelps, KY · overall 1/5
- Andersonville TN Opco LLC — Andersonville, TN · overall 3/5
- Beech Tree Health and Rehabilitation — Jellico, TN · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Church Hill Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center — Church Hill, TN · overall —/5SFF
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What is your current policy for testing residents and staff when someone shows symptoms or there's an outbreak?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Tennessee midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHC Healthcare, Scott | 1.8 mi | Lawrenceburg, TN | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare, Lawrenceburg | 3.5 mi | Lawrenceburg, TN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mt Pleasant Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 18.4 mi | Mount Pleasant, TN | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lewis Park Post Acute | 19.3 mi | Hohenwald, TN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 445280.