How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Holland Lake Rehabilitation and Wellness Center
1201 Holland Lake Dr, Weatherford, TX 76086 (opens Google Maps) · Parker County · (817) 598-0160· 120 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Sep 18, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 8, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.63
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 13 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Apr 12, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Jan 8, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 3, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Jan 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Oct 17, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Aug 31, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 31, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 31, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 31, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Aug 31, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 31, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (1 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.63
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.44
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.97
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.63 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 28% in Texas; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 38% in Texas; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.97 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 44% in Texas; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 26% in Texas; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 29.9 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 5% in Texas; top 14% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 50.0 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 41% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.42, weekend 2.82.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.45 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Holland Lake Rehabilitation and Wellness Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balsamo, Krystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Culp, Roland | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Culp, Roland | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Daspit, Laurence | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Daspit, Laurence | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Dohn, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Dohn, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Edwards, Rhonda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Forvis Mazars, LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/29/2025 |
| HMG Park Manor of Holland Lake, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Jackson, Helen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2019 |
| Murrell, Edward | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2012 |
| Murrell, Edward | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Pico, Ana | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Pico, Ana | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Prince, Derek | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Prince, Derek | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/29/2025 |
| Prince, Derek | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
| Reinarz, Christian | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2021 |
Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain HMG Healthcare — 31 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC — Desoto, TX · overall 3/5
- Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Mission, TX · overall 4/5
- Park Manor of Cyfair — Houston, TX · overall 5/5
- Park Manor of Cypress Station — Houston, TX · overall 1/5abuse
- Park Manor of Humble — Humble, TX · overall 4/5
- Park Manor of Quail Valley — Missouri City, TX · overall 2/5
- Park Manor of South Belt — Houston, TX · overall 4/5
- Park Manor of the Woodlands — The Woodlands, TX · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 30 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 35 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 14 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Fe Health & Rehabilitation Center | 0.2 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hilltop Park Rehabilitation and Care Center | 0.3 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center | 0.6 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Peach Tree Place | 1.3 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Avir at Keeneland | 2.2 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Avir at Weatherford | 2.9 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Willow Park Rehabilitation and Care Center | 3.0 mi | Willow Park, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Springtown Park Rehabilitation and Care Center | 16.0 mi | Springtown, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Azle Manor Health Care, L.L.L.P. | 17.8 mi | Azle, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Side Campus of Care | 18.1 mi | White Settlement, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Willow Ridge Wellness & Rehabilitation | 18.7 mi | Fort Worth, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Benbrook Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 18.9 mi | Benbrook, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675633.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).