How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Park Manor of the Woodlands
1014 Windsor Lake Boulevard, The Woodlands, TX 77384 (opens Google Maps) · Montgomery County · (936) 273-9424· 124 certified beds · avg 107 residents/day · certified since Feb 17, 2011 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 21, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint F-0732
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 12 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint · F-0732 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated. · F-0807 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | C |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.61
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.42
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.03
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.61 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 29% in Texas; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 42% in Texas; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.03 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 40% in Texas; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 34% in Texas; bottom 43% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.6 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 29% in Texas; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 30.0 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 18% in Texas; top 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.93, RN 0.46, weekend 3.30.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.93 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Park Manor of the Woodlands. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2018 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2018 |
| Zions Bancorporation | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2018 |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2021 |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2021 |
| Culp, Roland | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2012 |
| Culp, Roland | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2012 |
| Daspit, Laurence | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2012 |
| Daspit, Laurence | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2012 |
| Dohn, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2019 |
| Dohn, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/27/2019 |
| Healthmark Group LTD | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/27/2025 |
| HM Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/27/2025 |
| HMG Park Manor of the Woodlands LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/27/2025 |
| Hussain, Feroze | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Mattewal, Amarbir | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Meghani, Ashrafali | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2023 |
| Meghani, Ashrafali | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2023 |
| Murrell, Edward | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2012 |
| Murrell, Edward | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
Showing 20 of 33 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 13 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain HMG Healthcare — 31 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Park Manor of Tomball — Tomball, TX · overall 2/5
- Park Manor of Westchase — Houston, TX · overall 2/5
- Pecan Bayou Nursing and Rehabilitation — Brownwood, TX · overall 5/5
- Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation Center — Red Oak, TX · overall 3/5
- Silver Spring — Abilene, TX · overall 1/5
- Stallings Court Nursing and Rehabilitation — Nacogdoches, TX · overall 5/5
- Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation — Fort Worth, TX · overall 5/5
- Treviso Transitional Care — Longview, TX · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 30 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 44% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 33 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 29 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ridgewood at the Woodlands | 3.6 mi | The Woodlands, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Woodlands Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.2 mi | The Woodlands, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Park Manor of Conroe | 4.9 mi | Conroe, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Brightpointe | 5.1 mi | Conroe, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Broadmoor at Creekside Park | 5.5 mi | The Woodlands, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Village at Gleannloch Farms | 7.5 mi | Spring, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Woodland Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 7.7 mi | Conroe, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Conroe Health Care Center | 8.5 mi | Conroe, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Tomball Rehab & Nursing | 11.7 mi | Tomball, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Heights of North Houston | 12.7 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Park Manor of Tomball | 12.8 mi | Tomball, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Paradigm Northwest | 12.9 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Montgomery, TX — 12 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- The Heights of Magnolia — Magnolia, TX · overall —/5
- The Heights on Valley Ranch — Porter, TX · overall 4/5
- Willis Nursing and Rehabilitation — Willis, TX · overall 4/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676273.