TexasWhite Settlement

West Side Campus of Care

1950 S Las Vegas Trail, White Settlement, TX 76108 · Tarrant County · 234 certified beds · avg 175 residents/day · certified since Jan 15, 1986

Part of chain: OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT (66 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$31,279
Fines, last 3 years
2.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 8, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 8, 2025 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 8, 2025 · F-0695 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Apr 28, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 5, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 6, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 26, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Mar 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Dec 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Jul 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · from a complaint
Dec 7, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Oct 5, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202351J ▲
202420E
2025123J ▲
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $31,279.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 8, 2025Fine$6,897
May 8, 2025Fine$9,113
Oct 5, 2023Fine$15,269

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.583.463.95bottom 5% in Texas; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.320.440.69bottom 34% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.353.043.50bottom 8% in Texas; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.340.48top 17% in Texas; top 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)36.355.345.8top 14% in Texas; top 27% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.354.642.9top 25% in Texas; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.07, RN 0.39, weekend 2.79. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Coryell County Memorial Hospital AuthorityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/01/2017
1905 Las Vegas Trail, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Akinmerese, OlawaleIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2005
Akinmerese, OlawaleIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/03/2005
Byrom, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2015
Continuum Rehab Group LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Garetz, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Gibraltar TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Gurwitz, SolomonIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/02/2025
Hagins, ElizabethIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/28/2025
Hansen Hunter LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Hansen Hunter LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/02/2025
Kaplan, EstherIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/02/2025
Kaplan, MordechaiIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/28/2025
Mindle, AdamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/02/2025
Okyere, GeorgeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2024
Okyere, GeorgeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/15/2024
Opco Ca Skilled Mgmt INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Opco Texas Skilled Mgmt LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Oregon Realty, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Willow Ridge Wellness & Rehabilitation0.6 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
White Settlement Nursing Center1.4 miWhite Settlement, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Ridgmar Medical Lodge2.1 miFort Worth, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Benbrook Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.4 miBenbrook, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Arlington Heights Health and Rehabilitation Center4.5 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Renaissance Park Multi Care Center4.6 miFort Worth, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Lake Lodge Nursing & Rehabilitation4.9 miLake Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Stonegate Nursing and Rehabilitation5.2 miFort Worth, TX★★★★★4/5
Fort Worth Wellness & Rehabilitation5.4 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Cityview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.8 miFort Worth, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of Fort Worth5.9 miFort Worth, TX★★★★☆3/5
River Oaks Health and Rehabilitation Center6.0 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in White Settlement →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455592.