TexasWillow Park

Willow Park Rehabilitation and Care Center

300 Crowne Point Blvd, Willow Park, TX 76087 · Parker County · 125 certified beds · avg 92 residents/day · certified since Sep 4, 2014

Part of chain: NEXION HEALTH (51 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.26
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 23, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
May 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Apr 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Apr 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Feb 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Feb 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 15, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
Feb 15, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 7, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310E
2024100E
202570F
2026100F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.263.463.95bottom 45% in Texas; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.240.440.69bottom 16% in Texas; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.973.043.50top 43% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.300.340.48top 48% in Texas; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)75.055.345.8bottom 16% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)89.754.642.9bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.49, RN 0.26, weekend 3.19. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Parker County Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/01/2026
Bacus, RandyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/13/2026
Home River Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Home River Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/28/2026
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Niles, RichardIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Niles, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Niles, RichardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Retama Pkwy Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Wimmer, CalvinIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Wimmer, CalvinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026
Wimmer, CalvinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2026

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center2.8 miWeatherford, TX★★★★☆5/5
Holland Lake Rehabilitation and Wellness Center3.0 miWeatherford, TX★★★★★4/5
Santa Fe Health & Rehabilitation Center3.2 miWeatherford, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Hilltop Park Rehabilitation and Care Center3.2 miWeatherford, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Peach Tree Place3.7 miWeatherford, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Avir at Keeneland4.4 miWeatherford, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Avir at Weatherford5.8 miWeatherford, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Avir at Granbury17.1 miGranbury, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Granbury Care Center17.9 miGranbury, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
West Side Campus of Care18.0 miWhite Settlement, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Willow Park →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676365.