How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
201 Williams Ward Rd., Springtown, TX 76082 (opens Google Maps) · Parker County · (817) 755-5116· 120 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 2021 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. F-0755
The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. F-0694
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint · F-0622 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Dec 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint · F-0655 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Aug 18, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.84 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 14% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.24 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 15% in Texas; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.60 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 7% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 63.4 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 27% in Texas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 60.0 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.19, RN 0.27, weekend 2.92.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.19 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Springtown Park Rehabilitation and Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker County Hospital District | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/01/2024 |
| Bacus, Randy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2024 |
| Bauder Family Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder Family Investments, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder, Kelly | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder, Kelly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder, Madison | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder, Madison | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder, Parker | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder, Parker | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder, William | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Bauder, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Boulware St James LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Boulware St James LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Boulware, Douglas | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Boulware, Sandra | Individual | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Boulware, Sandra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
| Boulware, Steven | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2024 |
Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Priority Management — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azle Manor Health Care, L.L.L.P. | 9.7 mi | Azle, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avir at Weatherford | 14.4 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Hilltop Park Rehabilitation and Care Center | 15.8 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Santa Fe Health & Rehabilitation Center | 15.9 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Holland Lake Rehabilitation and Wellness Center | 16.0 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Peach Tree Place | 16.2 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Avir at Keeneland | 16.3 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center | 16.5 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Lake Lodge Nursing & Rehabilitation | 17.2 mi | Lake Worth, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Decatur Medical Lodge | 18.3 mi | Decatur, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgeport Medical Lodge | 18.3 mi | Bridgeport, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Willow Park Rehabilitation and Care Center | 18.8 mi | Willow Park, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676499.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details