TexasWeatherford

Hilltop Park Rehabilitation and Care Center

970 Hilltop Dr, Weatherford, TX 76086 · Parker County · 132 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Aug 13, 2003

Part of chain: PRIORITY MANAGEMENT (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$102,810
Fines, last 3 years
3.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 14, 2025 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.

Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Feb 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Feb 14, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Feb 15, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Mar 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · from a complaint
Mar 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Sep 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 14, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 22, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Aug 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 22, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 22, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jul 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024110F
202552K ▲
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $102,810.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 14, 2025Fine$102,810

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.663.463.95top 27% in Texas; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.210.440.69bottom 8% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.303.043.50top 23% in Texas; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.180.340.48bottom 15% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)73.355.345.8bottom 17% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)75.054.642.9bottom 25% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.62, RN 0.21, weekend 3.27. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Parker County Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/15/2015
Bacus, RandyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder Family Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder Family Investments, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, KellyIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, KellyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, MadisonIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, MadisonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, ParkerIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, ParkerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, WilliamIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Bauder, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Boulware St James LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Boulware St James LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Boulware, DouglasIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Boulware, DouglasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Boulware, SandraIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Boulware, SandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015
Boulware, StevenIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Holland Lake Rehabilitation and Wellness Center0.3 miWeatherford, TX★★★★★4/5
Santa Fe Health & Rehabilitation Center0.3 miWeatherford, TX★★★☆☆4/5
College Park Rehabilitation and Care Center0.8 miWeatherford, TX★★★★☆5/5
Peach Tree Place1.4 miWeatherford, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Avir at Keeneland2.2 miWeatherford, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Avir at Weatherford2.8 miWeatherford, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Willow Park Rehabilitation and Care Center3.2 miWillow Park, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Springtown Park Rehabilitation and Care Center15.8 miSpringtown, TX★★★★★5/5
Azle Manor Health Care, L.L.L.P.17.6 miAzle, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
West Side Campus of Care18.0 miWhite Settlement, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Willow Ridge Wellness & Rehabilitation18.6 miFort Worth, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Benbrook Nursing & Rehabilitation Center18.8 miBenbrook, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Weatherford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675988.