Texas ›Desoto

Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

109 Methodist Way, Desoto, TX 75115 (opens Google Maps) · Dallas County · (281) 419-5520· 100 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Oct 23, 2020 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 27, 2025
4
Serious findings on record
most recent May 8, 2025
$27,993
Fines, last 3 years
3.92
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 8, 2025 · F-0660 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.

Why it matters: Poor discharge planning can send a resident home or elsewhere without the support, equipment, or follow-up care they need.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 8, 2025 · F-0661 · triggered by a complaint

When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.

Why it matters: Missing handoff information — like current medications and conditions — is a common cause of dangerous errors after discharge.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · May 8, 2025 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: May 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Feb 5, 2025 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 3, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 27 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint F-0693

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint F-0694

View all 27 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint · F-0693
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Dec 10, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · from a complaint · F-0694
Dec 5, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · from a complaint · F-0576
Dec 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761
Jun 27, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565
Jun 27, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Jun 27, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Jun 27, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jun 27, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835
May 8, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint · F-0660
May 8, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint · F-0661
May 8, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835
May 8, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not make sure resident assessments were done by a qualified health professional. Assessments guide all of a resident's care, so the person doing them must be properly trained. · from a complaint · F-0642
May 8, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
May 8, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · from a complaint · F-0637
Feb 5, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, patternThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697
Feb 5, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Feb 5, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842
Feb 5, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Jul 15, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558
May 17, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 17, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Mar 23, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Mar 23, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693
Mar 23, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 21
Serious citations (G–L): 4

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
202430E
2025214K ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

2 fines totaling $27,993.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 8, 2025Fine$12,260
Feb 5, 2025Fine$15,733

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityTexas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.92
Texas average: 3.46
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.62
Texas average: 0.44
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.46
Texas average: 3.04
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.923.463.95top 17% in Texas; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.620.440.69top 15% in Texas; top 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.463.043.50top 18% in Texas; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.630.340.48top 7% in Texas; top 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)54.655.345.8bottom 44% in Texas; bottom 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.054.642.9top 30% in Texas; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.34, RN 0.68, weekend 3.83.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.34 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—04/01/2018
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—04/01/2018
HMG Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—11/01/2019
Methodist Hospitals of DallasOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—11/01/2019
Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—03/15/2020
Zions BancorporationOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest—04/01/2018
Anthamatten, DustinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Anthamatten, DustinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/15/2020
Balsamo, KrystalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Balsamo, KrystalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Cibc Bank USAOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Culp, RolandIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Culp, RolandIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Davis, GeorgetteIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/20/2001
Davis, GeorgetteIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/14/2023
Desoto Rehabilitation Institute LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019

Showing 20 of 47 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 27 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain HMG Healthcare — 31 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 30 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you prepare residents and families for discharge, and what support do you arrange for after they leave?"
  • "What exactly do you hand off to the next provider when a resident is discharged, and how do you confirm they received it?"
  • "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
  • "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
  • "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
  • "How can my family member make private phone or video calls, and can we see where?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 55% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 47 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 58 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Desoto Nursing & Rehabilitation Center0.9 miDesoto, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Park Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation1.6 miDesoto, TX★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Five Points Nursing and Rehabilitation2.2 miDesoto, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Williamsburg Village Healthcare Campus3.2 miDesoto, TX★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Windsor Gardens3.3 miLancaster, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
The Lennwood Nursing and Rehabilitation3.7 miDallas, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Duncanville Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center3.9 miDuncanville, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center4.0 miLancaster, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Cedar Hill Healthcare Center4.4 miCedar Hill, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Crestview Court4.6 miCedar Hill, TX★★★★★4/5
Red Oak Health and Rehabilitation Center5.1 miRed Oak, TX★★★☆☆4/5
The Laurenwood Nursing and Rehabilitation5.2 miDuncanville, TX★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Dallas, TX — 81 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Desoto →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676492.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details