Park Manor of Cypress Station
420 Lantern Bend Dr., Houston, TX 77090 · Harris County · 125 certified beds · avg 94 residents/day · certified since Jul 3, 2003
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 13, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Jun 14, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 25, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Sep 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Sep 25, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.
Corrected: Sep 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 25, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Sep 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 20, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 20, 2026 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 20, 2026 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Mar 21, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (27)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 20, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint |
| Mar 20, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| Jun 13, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| May 9, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. |
| May 9, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Sep 25, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Sep 25, 2023 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Sep 25, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Sep 25, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| Sep 25, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Mar 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. |
| Mar 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 10 | 3 | K ▲ |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 8 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2026 | 3 | 3 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
3 fines totaling $33,822.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | Fine | $4,305 |
| Jun 13, 2025 | Fine | $8,281 |
| Sep 25, 2023 | Fine | $21,236 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.26 | 3.46 | 3.95 | bottom 45% in Texas; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.21 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 9% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.79 | 3.04 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Texas; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 15% in Texas; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 61.0 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 31% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 46.2 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 40% in Texas; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.09, RN 0.20, weekend 2.64. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2018 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2018 |
| Zions Bancorporation | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2018 |
| Adelekan, Adebukola | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2011 |
| Adelekan, Adebukola | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/26/2011 |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Culp, Roland | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Culp, Roland | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Daspit, Laurence | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Daspit, Laurence | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Dohn, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| HMG Long Term Care, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2012 |
| HMG Park Manor of Cypress Station, L.L.C. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2017 |
| Mitchell, Vincent | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2024 |
| Mitchell, Vincent | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2024 |
| Murrell, Edward | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/02/2012 |
| Murrell, Edward | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Heights of North Houston | 0.3 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Paradigm Northwest | 0.5 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Villa Toscana at Cypress Woods | 2.6 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Village at Gleannloch Farms | 5.5 mi | Spring, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Avir at Veterans Memorial | 7.1 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Champions Healthcare at Willowbrook | 7.4 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 8.4 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| North Houston Transitional Care | 8.6 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Deerbrook Skilled Nursing and Rehab Center | 9.2 mi | Humble, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| The Broadmoor at Creekside Park | 9.2 mi | The Woodlands, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Crimson Heights Health & Wellness | 9.7 mi | Humble, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Park Manor of Humble | 9.7 mi | Humble, TX | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675986.