TexasMission

Mission Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

1013 S. Bryan Rd., Mission, TX 78572 · Hidalgo County · 170 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Jul 27, 1988

Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,190
Fines, last 3 years
3.09
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 6, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 10, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 2, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
May 28, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · from a complaint
May 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 6, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 6, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202381G ▲
202430D
202550D
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,190.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 6, 2023Fine$8,190

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.093.463.95bottom 30% in Texas; bottom 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.440.69top 47% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.673.043.50bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.270.340.48bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.355.345.8top 9% in Texas; top 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.354.642.9top 20% in Texas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.42, RN 0.44, weekend 2.96. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Culp, RolandIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
HMG Park Manor of Mission, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Murrell, EdwardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2012
Pico, AnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/04/2021
Prince, DerekIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Rollo, JefferyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2012
Rollo, JefferyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2012
Stramecki, AnthonyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Stramecki, AnthonyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Vratis, KaceyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Vratis, KaceyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2016
Way, GeorgeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Way, GeorgeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Way, GeorgeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Winnie-Stowell Hospital DistrictOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Mission Valley Nursing and Transitional Care0.1 miMission, TX★★★★☆3/5
Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation3.4 miMcAllen, TX★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Briarcliff Nursing and Rehabilitation Center4.4 miMcAllen, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of McAll4.9 miMcAllen, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Grand Terrace Rehabilitation and Healthcare5.2 miMcAllen, TX★★★★★5/5
Alfredo Gonzalez Texas State Veterans Home5.8 miMcAllen, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
McAllen Nursing Center6.1 miMcAllen, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
McAllen Transitional Care Center6.4 miMcAllen, TX★★★★☆3/5
Windsor Las Palmas Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent6.5 miMcAllen, TX★★★★★5/5
Colonial Manor Advanced Rehab & Healthcare8.2 miPharr, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Las Alturas de Penitas8.6 miPenitas, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Edinburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.9 miEdinburg, TX★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mission →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455761.