TexasMissouri City

Park Manor of Quail Valley

2350 Fm 1092, Missouri City, TX 77459 · Fort Bend County · 125 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Nov 2, 2005

Part of chain: HMG HEALTHCARE (31 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Jun 24, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jun 25, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 24, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Feb 2, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Feb 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320F
2024120E
2025101K ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.233.463.95bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.240.440.69bottom 14% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.883.043.50bottom 46% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.190.340.48bottom 20% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.955.345.8top 11% in Texas; top 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.054.642.9top 41% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.33, RN 0.24, weekend 2.96. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/01/2018
Forvis Mazars LLPOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/01/2018
Sabra Health Care Reit INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/01/2018
Balsamo, KrystalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2024
Balsamo, KrystalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/13/2024
Culp, RolandIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2012
Culp, RolandIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2012
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2012
Daspit, LaurenceIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2012
Dohn, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2019
Dohn, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2019
HMG Park Manor of Quail Valley, L.L.C.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2017
Joy, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2012
Joy, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/31/2012
Lege, RodneyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2020
Lege, RodneyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/18/2020
Murrell, EdwardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Pico, AnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2012
Pico, AnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2012
Prince, DerekIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Windsor Quail Valley Post-Acute Healthcare1.2 miMissouri City, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Chelsea Gardens1.4 miMissouri City, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Paradigm at First Colony1.4 miMissouri City, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ignite Medical Resort Sugar Land, LLC4.8 miSugar Land, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Sugar Land Health Care Center4.9 miSugar Land, TX★★★☆☆3/5
The Crescent5.1 miSugar Land, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Focused Care at Westwood6.7 miHouston, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Houston Transitional Care7.2 miHouston, TX★★★☆☆4/5
West Houston Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center7.3 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Paradigm at Westbury7.5 miHouston, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Seven Acres Jewish Senior Care Services7.5 miHouston, TX★★★★☆3/5
Focused Care at Beechnut7.6 miHouston, TX★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Missouri City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676073.