Florida ›Haines City

Haines City Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

409 S 10th St, Haines City, FL 33844 · Polk County · 120 certified beds · avg 108 residents/day · certified since Dec 14, 1983

Part of chain: ASTON HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$13,380
Fines, last 3 years
3.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 30, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 30, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Apr 30, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2021110E
202380E
2024130E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $13,380.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 21, 2024Fine$4,017
Nov 21, 2024Fine$4,017
Nov 21, 2024Fine$5,346

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.594.033.95bottom 23% in Florida; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.600.760.69bottom 40% in Florida; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.303.683.50bottom 22% in Florida; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.530.48bottom 48% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.441.445.8top 32% in Florida; top 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)52.646.042.9bottom 37% in Florida; bottom 32% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.55, RN 0.59, weekend 3.26. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
HC Rehab Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/03/2018
Quality Rehab Partners LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%06/20/2019
Aston Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
King, CazzieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/12/2022
King, CazzieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/02/2025
Manubens, ClaudioIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2019
Manubens, ClaudioIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/02/2025
Pemberton, CandisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/06/2022
Pierre-Graves, WileneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/16/2022
Wildes, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2025
Wildes, DonnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Davenport Nursing and Rehab Center4.3 miDavenport, FL★★★★☆3/5
Astoria Health and Rehabilitation Center7.2 miWinter Haven, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Lake Mariam Health and Rehabilitation Center7.6 miWinter Haven, FL★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Vivo Healthcare Winter Haven7.6 miWinter Haven, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Spring Lake Rehabilitation Center8.0 miWinter Haven, FL★★★★★3/5
Palm Garden of Winter Haven8.2 miWinter Haven, FL★★★★☆3/5
Life Care Center of Winter Haven8.3 miWinter Haven, FL★★★★☆3/5
Winter Haven Health and Rehabilitation Center8.9 miWinter Haven, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Oak Haven Rehab and Nursing Center9.5 miAuburndale, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Lake Wales Health and Rehabilitation Center13.2 miLake Wales, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Groves Center14.7 miLake Wales, FL—/5abuseSFF
Solaris Healthcare Celebration15.4 miKissimmee, FL★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Haines City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105442.