How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Hawthorne Center for Rehabilitation and Healing of
851 West Lumsden Rd, Brandon, FL 33511 (opens Google Maps) · Hillsborough County · (813) 661-8998· 132 certified beds · avg 121 residents/day · certified since Mar 27, 1995 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SUMMIT CARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 3.3★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 13, 2024
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Sep 25, 2020
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.26
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Sep 25, 2020 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Sep 25, 2020 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 14, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 25, 2020 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Sep 25, 2020 · F-0835
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Dec 14, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint F-0582
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645
View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint · F-0582 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Mar 13, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jan 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Jan 3, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint · F-0759 |
| Dec 10, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Dec 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Dec 10, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · F-0773 |
| Sep 25, 2020 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 25, 2020 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Sep 25, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2021
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 2 | L ▲ |
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.26
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.85
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.95
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.26 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 3% in Florida; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.85 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 31% in Florida; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.95 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 2% in Florida; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.79 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 16% in Florida; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 36.7 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 37% in Florida; top 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 32.1 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 25% in Florida; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.74, RN 0.97, weekend 3.39.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.74 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hawthorne Center for Rehabilitation and Healing of. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hawthorne Brandon SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/31/2021 |
| Hawthorne Care Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/04/2021 |
| Stanton, Susan | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/04/2021 |
All 3 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Summit Care — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Lake Bennet Center for Rehabilitation & Healing — Ocoee, FL · overall 3/5
- Lakeside Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Jacksonville, FL · overall 4/5
- Madison Health and Rehabilitation Center — Madison, FL · overall 5/5
- North Bank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Jacksonville, FL · overall 5/5
- Northbrook Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Brooksville, FL · overall 2/5
- Palatka Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Palatka, FL · overall 2/5
- Sandy Ridge Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Milton, FL · overall 4/5
- Santa Rosa Center for Rehabilitation and Healing — Milton, FL · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Florida midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 37% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 29 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviata at Central Park | 0.5 mi | Brandon, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at Oakfield | 0.8 mi | Brandon, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Victoria Crossing Rehabilitation Center | 1.6 mi | Brandon, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Elon Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.4 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ybor City Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 9.7 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Whispering Oaks | 9.7 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Community Convalescent Center | 11.4 mi | Plant City, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Canterbury Towers INC | 11.7 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bayshore Pointe Nursing and Rehab Center | 12.1 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center of Tampa | 12.2 mi | Tampa, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Excel Care Center | 12.2 mi | Tampa, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at the Bay | 12.3 mi | Tampa, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hillsborough, FL — 30 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Luxe at Lutz Rehabilitation Center (the) — Lutz, FL · overall 1/5
- Northdale Rehabilitation Center — Tampa, FL · overall 4/5
- Palm Garden of Sun City — Sun City Center, FL · overall 1/5abuse
- Palm Garden of Tampa — Tampa, FL · overall 4/5
- Plaza West — Sun City Center, FL · overall 3/5
- Pruitthealth-North Tampa, LLC — Lutz, FL · overall 2/5
- Solaris Healthcare Plant City — Plant City, FL · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105881.