FloridaJacksonville

Fouraker Hills Rehab and Nursing Center

1650 Fouraker Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32221 · Duval County · 120 certified beds · avg 117 residents/day · certified since Aug 10, 1990

Part of chain: ASTON HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 16, 2021 · F-0607

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 27, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jul 16, 2021 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Sep 1, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Jul 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Feb 16, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Jul 16, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jul 16, 2021▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 16, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202142J ▲
202350F
202460E
202550E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.234.033.95top 25% in Florida; top 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.480.760.69bottom 20% in Florida; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.833.683.50top 27% in Florida; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.300.530.48bottom 22% in Florida; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.041.445.8
RN turnover (%)0.046.042.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.42, RN 0.39, weekend 3.09. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Gutman, SamuelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/07/2018
WJ Care Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/07/2018
Aston Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Blatt, MarcIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/19/2025
Blatt, MarcIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/22/2025
Burkes, SonyaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/15/2024
Fenaes, EmileeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2024
Fenaes, EmileeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2025
Lacy, SusieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2023
Wildes, DonnaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2025
Wildes, DonnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2025
Wildes, DonnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Vivo Healthcare Normandy0.7 miJacksonville, FL★★★★☆3/5
Westside Oaks Rehabilitation & Nursing Center2.2 miJacksonville, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Cedar Hill Nursing and Rehab Center4.1 miJacksonville, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Riverside Post Acute5.7 miJacksonville, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Park Ridge Nursing Center6.2 miJacksonville, FL★★★★★5/5
Jacksonville Rehabilitation and Nursing7.9 miJacksonville, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Shands Jacksonville Medical Center8.0 miJacksonville, FL★★★★★5/5
North Bank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing8.1 miJacksonville, FL★★★★★4/5
Life Care Center at Wells Crossing8.2 miOrange Park, FL★★★★★4/5
Vivo Healthcare Orange Park8.5 miOrange Park, FL★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Jacksonville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105707.