Advanced Subacute Rehabilitation Center at Sewell
685 Salina Road, Sewell, NJ 08080 · Gloucester County · 139 certified beds · avg 130 residents/day · certified since Oct 9, 2014
Part of chain: FAMILY OF CARING HEALTHCARE (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 7, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Apr 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (20)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Jan 29, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Mar 7, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Mar 7, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Mar 7, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 29, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Nov 30, 2020 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $34,398.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2025 | Fine | $34,398 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.78 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 42% in New Jersey; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.30 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 5% in New Jersey; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.42 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 44% in New Jersey; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.1 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 43% in New Jersey; top 29% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 33% in New Jersey; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.05, RN 0.32, weekend 3.66. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Associates at Sewell LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/15/2014 |
| Friedman, Edward | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 63% | 08/15/2014 |
| Friedman, Nathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 37% | 08/15/2014 |
| Adinolfi, Anthony | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/05/2025 |
| Friedman, Edward | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2014 |
| Friedman, Edward | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2014 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Methodist Communities at Pitman | 3.0 mi | Pitman, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center LLC | 3.2 mi | Blackwood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Atlas Post Acute at Woodbury Country Club | 3.7 mi | Woodbury, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 3.8 mi | Deptford, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Shady Lane Gloucester Co Home | 4.4 mi | Clarksboro, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Center for Rehab & Nursing Washington Township | 4.8 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare at West Deptfor | 6.3 mi | West Deptford, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Washington | 6.3 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 7.4 mi | Stratford, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees | 9.4 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| St Monica Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 9.5 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lions Gate | 9.8 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315516.