16 Cratetown Road, Lebanon, NJ 08833 (opens Google Maps) · Hunterdon County · (908) 236-2011· 67 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OCEAN HEALTHCARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 18, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Nov 22, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2025 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the building. · F-0922 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · F-0882 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides were properly trained — aides working more than 4 months must be trained and competent, and newer aides must be enrolled in training. · F-0728 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 9 | 1 | L ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $43,001.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2025 | Fine | $33,231 |
| Nov 22, 2023 | Fine | $9,770 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.27 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 21% in New Jersey; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.46 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 34% in New Jersey; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.11 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 33% in New Jersey; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 43% in New Jersey; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.6 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 48% in New Jersey; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 15% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.37, RN 0.48, weekend 3.21.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.37 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Rolling Hills Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feigenbaum, Deborah | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2003 |
| Frankel, Abraham | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Kuperwasser, Charles | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Silver, Maier | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Ugowitz, Joseph | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Dynamic Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Dynamic Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Feigenbaum, Deborah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/04/2010 |
| Feigenbaum, Melvin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Feigenbaum, Melvin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Frankel, Abraham | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Krasner, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2024 |
| Krasner, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2024 |
| Kuperwasser, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Newpoint Real Estate Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2016 |
| Silver, Maier | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Tender Touch Rehabilitation LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2007 |
| Tender Touch Rehabilitation LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ocean Healthcare — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunterdon Care Center LLC | 3.8 mi | Flemington, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Country Arch Care Center | 4.2 mi | Pittstown, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Little Brook Nursing and Convalescent Home | 10.1 mi | Califon, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Foothill Acres Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 10.8 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Waterfront Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 12.1 mi | Raritan, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bridgeway Care and Rehab Center at Bridgewater | 12.1 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Green Knoll | 12.8 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgeway Care and Rehab Center at Hillsborough | 13.2 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Arbor at Laurel Circle | 14.3 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| N J Eastern Star Home | 15.1 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Skilled Nursing at Fellowship Village | 15.4 mi | Basking Ridge, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heath Village | 16.6 mi | Hackettstown, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315302.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details