480 Parkway Drive, East Orange, NJ 07017 (opens Google Maps) · Essex County · (973) 674-2700· 190 certified beds · avg 173 residents/day · certified since Sep 21, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OCEAN HEALTHCARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 22, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 9, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. F-0711
The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. F-0712
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Aug 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · from a complaint · F-0711 |
| Nov 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Nov 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Nov 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Nov 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Nov 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 5, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 5, 2021 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure the resident's doctor reviewed their care and wrote, signed, and dated progress notes and orders at each required visit. · F-0711 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 7 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $15,240.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2024 | Fine | $15,240 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.87 | 3.88 | 3.95 | top 36% in New Jersey; top 45% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 38% in New Jersey; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.42 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 43% in New Jersey; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 21% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.3 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 14% in New Jersey; top 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 11.8 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 5% in New Jersey; top 5% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.60, RN 0.45, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.60 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Park Crescent Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berman, Michael | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Drew, Zalman | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Feigenbaum, Deborah | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Meisels, Joseph | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Singer, Shemon | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Berman, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Drew, Zalman | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Dynamic Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2009 |
| Dynamic Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/17/2025 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Feigenbaum, Deborah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Florans, Tzvi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/23/2023 |
| Florans, Tzvi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/23/2023 |
| M&t Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2014 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
| Meisels, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/30/2008 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ocean Healthcare — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Orange Park | 0.7 mi | East Orange, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Grove Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | East Orange, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Job Haines Home for Aged People | 1.0 mi | Bloomfield, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Axia Care Center of Orange | 1.4 mi | Orange, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brookhaven Health Care Center | 1.9 mi | East Orange, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Forest Hills Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 1.9 mi | Newark, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Broadway House for Continuing Care | 2.1 mi | Newark, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| New Vista Nursing & Rehabilitation Ctr | 2.1 mi | Newark, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sinai Post-Acute Nursing & Rehab Center | 2.1 mi | Newark, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| White House Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 2.2 mi | Orange, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| New Community Extended Care Facility | 2.4 mi | Newark, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Montclair Care Center | 2.5 mi | Montclair, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Essex, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315266.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details