How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Hunterdon Care Center LLC
1 Leisure Court, Flemington, NJ 08822 (opens Google Maps) · Hunterdon County · (908) 788-9292· 185 certified beds · avg 167 residents/day · certified since Mar 17, 1986 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OCEAN HEALTHCARE (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 19, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 14, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.53
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Aug 14, 2025 · F-0627 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Aug 14, 2025 · F-0627 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
Why it matters: A rushed or poorly planned move can leave a resident somewhere that can't meet their needs.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 9, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint F-0627
The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint F-0628
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. F-0607
View all 24 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint · F-0627 |
| Aug 14, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Oct 9, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 9, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 9).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 11 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.53
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.57
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.32
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.53 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in New Jersey; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.57 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 49% in New Jersey; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.32 | 3.53 | 3.50 | top 49% in New Jersey; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 45% in New Jersey; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.1 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 43% in New Jersey; top 29% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.2 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 20% in New Jersey; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.36, RN 0.54, weekend 3.16.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.36 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Hunterdon Care Center LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drew, Zalman | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Feigenbaum, Deborah | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Friedman, Aaron | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Friedman, Aaron | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| Maierovits, Avrohom | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Marfield Investments INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| R & F Healthcare Holdings, INC. | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| Rosdev Hotel Management Services INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| Rosenberg HCC Holdings LP | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| Rosenberg, Martin | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| Rosenberg, Michael | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| Rosenberg, Thomas | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| Tr Hunterdon Holdings, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2013 |
| Drew, Zalman | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Dynamic Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Dynamic Healthcare Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2025 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Feigenbaum, Avraham | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
| Feigenbaum, Deborah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2009 |
Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ocean Healthcare — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Park Crescent Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — East Orange, NJ · overall 4/5
- Rolling Hills Care Center — Lebanon, NJ · overall 1/5
- Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation — Galloway Township, NJ · overall 4/5
- South Mountain HC — Vauxhall, NJ · overall 3/5
- Aspen Hills Healthcare Center — Pemberton, NJ · overall 2/5
- Atlantic Coast Rehab & Health — Lakewood, NJ · overall 1/5abuse
- Elmora Hills Health & Rehabilitation Center — Elizabeth, NJ · overall 5/5
- Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center LLC — Blackwood, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 37% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 36 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 27 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Hills Care Center | 3.8 mi | Lebanon, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Country Arch Care Center | 6.9 mi | Pittstown, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Foothill Acres Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 8.7 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bridgeway Care and Rehab Center at Hillsborough | 11.4 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waterfront Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 11.9 mi | Raritan, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bridgeway Care and Rehab Center at Bridgewater | 11.9 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Complete Care at Green Knoll | 12.9 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Little Brook Nursing and Convalescent Home | 13.8 mi | Califon, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| The Arbor at Laurel Circle | 14.0 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Stonebridge at Montgomery Health Care Center | 14.1 mi | Skillman, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| N J Eastern Star Home | 14.7 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Skilled Nursing at Fellowship Village | 16.5 mi | Basking Ridge, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315226.