How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Complete Care at Bayshore LLC
715 North Beers Street, Holmdel, NJ 07733 (opens Google Maps) · Monmouth County · (732) 739-9000· 232 certified beds · avg 149 residents/day · certified since Jan 11, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Oct 30, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 3, 2022
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.06
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 3, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 3, 2022 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Sep 13, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 38 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint F-0641
The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint F-0838
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 38 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Dec 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint · F-0838 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint · F-0624 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Feb 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 19, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · F-0680 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Aug 3, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 5).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 17
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2023
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 17 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2023 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.06
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.30
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.85
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.06 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 7% in New Jersey; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.30 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 6% in New Jersey; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.85 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 12% in New Jersey; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.21 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 13% in New Jersey; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 45% in New Jersey; top 31% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 42% in New Jersey; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.78, RN 0.37, weekend 3.52.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.78 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Bayshore LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC HMH Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/16/2023 |
| PC HMH Opco Holdngs LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/16/2023 |
| SMS 2021 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/16/2023 |
| Stein, Shalom | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Bayshore Propco Holdco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Bayshore Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Levovitz, Yitzchok | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Levovitz, Yitzchok | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Matzliah, Menachem | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Matzliah, Menachem | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Nasra, Magdy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Nasra, Magdy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Opoku, Constance | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| PC HMH Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| PC HMH Propco Intermediate 9 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Complete Care at Bey Lea, LLC — Toms River, NJ · overall 4/5
- Complete Care at Brakeley Park — Phillipsburg, NJ · overall 2/5
- Complete Care at Brick LLC — Brick, NJ · overall 3/5
- Complete Care at Burlington Woods, LLC — Burlington, NJ · overall 4/5
- Complete Care at Cedar Grove — Cedar Grove, NJ · overall 4/5
- Complete Care at Chestnut Hill LLC — Passaic, NJ · overall 1/5
- Complete Care at Clark LLC — Clark, NJ · overall 4/5
- Complete Care at Court House, LLC — Cape May Court House, NJ · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What does your discharge planning process look like, and how are families involved before a move?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 38% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 104 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anchor Care and Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | Hazlet, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Meadowbrook Respiratory and Nursing Center | 2.3 mi | Matawan, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Careone at Holmdel | 2.7 mi | Holmdel, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 2.9 mi | Hazlet, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Madison, LLC | 2.9 mi | Matawan, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Laurel Bay Health & Rehabilitation Center | 3.9 mi | Keansburg, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| De la Salle Hall | 6.0 mi | Lincroft, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Venetian Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 6.4 mi | South Amboy, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Old Bridge, LLC | 6.9 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Roosevelt Care Center at Old Bridge | 7.1 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Reformed Church Home | 7.5 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Redbank Center for Rehabilitation and Healing | 7.6 mi | Red Bank, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Monmouth, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Complete Care at Monmouth, LLC — Long Branch, NJ · overall 2/5
- Complete Care at Ocean Grove LLC — Ocean Grove, NJ · overall 2/5
- Complete Care at Shrewsbury LLC — Shrewsbury, NJ · overall 3/5
- Complete Care at Wall LLC — Wall, NJ · overall 2/5
- Continuing Care at Seabrook — Tinton Falls, NJ · overall 5/5
- Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Neptune City, NJ · overall 4/5
- Excel Care at Manalapan — Manalapan, NJ · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315252.