PennsylvaniaGreensburg

Rehab & Nursing Ctr Greater Pittsburgh

890 Weatherwood Lane, Greensburg, PA 15601 · Westmoreland County · 120 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Apr 29, 1991

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CAREONE (37 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$8,159
Fines, last 3 years
3.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 28, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 1, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 28, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 1, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 22, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 22, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 15, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 13, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 28, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 28, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 26, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 26, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Nov 26, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Nov 26, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 26, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency.
Apr 22, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 22, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 15, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310E
202431G ▲
2025102G ▲
202632G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,159.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 15, 2024Fine$8,159

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.743.943.95top 47% in Pennsylvania; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.750.800.69top 38% in Pennsylvania; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.443.583.50top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.490.560.48top 44% in Pennsylvania; top 34% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.844.545.8top 23% in Pennsylvania; top 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.139.942.9top 16% in Pennsylvania; top 16% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.95, RN 0.80, weekend 3.64. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Care Realty, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/30/2002
Des-I 2016 GratOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/01/2021
Straus, DanielIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2006
Thci Company, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/30/2002
Thci Holding Company, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/30/2002
Baruch, DavidIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Baruch, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Healthbridge Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2006

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Saint Anne Home1.2 miGreensburg, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Westmoreland Manor1.3 miGreensburg, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Hempfield Manor2.2 miGreensburg, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Oak Hill Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center2.4 miGreensburg, PA★★☆☆☆1/5
Greene Health & Rehab Center2.7 miGreensburg, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Redstone Highlands Health Care2.7 miGreensburg, PA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.5 miGreensburg, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Loyalhanna Care Center7.8 miLatrobe, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
William Penn Care Center8.3 miJeannette, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Transitions Healthcare North Huntingdon8.5 miNorth Huntingdon, PA★★★☆☆3/5
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Latrobe9.2 miLatrobe, PA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Harmon House Health & Rehab Center9.9 miMount Pleasant, PA★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Greensburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395851.