4100 North Blvd, Baton Rouge, LA 70806 (opens Google Maps) · E. Baton Rouge County · (225) 387-6705· 123 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 2011 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 7, 2025 · F-0697 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 21, 2024 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 16, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint F-0692
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Mar 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697 |
| Feb 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2025 | 10 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $158,019.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2025 | Fine | $149,195 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | Fine | $8,824 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.85 | 4.04 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in Louisiana; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 48% in Louisiana; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.59 | 3.45 | 3.50 | top 36% in Louisiana; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.48 | top 19% in Louisiana; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 32.9 | 47.6 | 45.8 | top 12% in Louisiana; top 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 41.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.24, weekend 3.22.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.45 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kisatchie Health, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 80% | 03/01/2018 |
| Prico, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 03/01/2018 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 03/31/2025 |
| Bolwahnn, Sheila | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Cantrell, Jeffrey Lee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/07/2025 |
| Hancock Whitney Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2023 |
| Kisatchie Health, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Prico, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Rogers, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Shelton, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2018 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Central Management Company — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mid City Community Nursing and Rehab | 0.1 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Sterling Place Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 0.2 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Baton Rouge General Medical Center, SNF | 0.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| St James Place Nursing Care Center | 3.6 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ollie Steele Burden Manor | 3.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Port Allen | 4.3 mi | Port Allen, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Center Point Health Care and Rehab | 4.4 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Landmark of Baton Rouge | 4.5 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II | 4.5 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Guest House Care Center | 4.6 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Jefferson Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC | 5.1 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in E. Baton Rouge, LA — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195635.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details